From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This recipe adds ability to configure a BSP image for a specific
machine or platform at the boot time. The machine configurations
are not provided here, and are to be provided in the BSP layers.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
On 8/28/14, 1:47 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This recipe adds ability to configure a BSP image for a specific
machine or platform at the boot time. The machine configurations
are not provided here, and are to be provided in the BSP layers.
On 28 August 2014 19:47, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
+PE = 1
No need for an epoch.
+PACKAGE_ARCH = ${MACHINE_ARCH}
Wouldn't it be simpler to have this as normal architecture, and depend
on a machine-specific data package?
Ross
--
___
] imageconfigurator: a new recipe for
boottime image configuration
On 28 August 2014 19:47, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
+PE = 1
No need for an epoch.
Commit changed on the contrib branch for this.
+PACKAGE_ARCH = ${MACHINE_ARCH}
Wouldn't it be simpler to have this as normal architecture
On 28 August 2014 21:14, Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be simpler to have this as normal architecture, and depend on a
machine-specific data package?
This really need to be machine specific. For every BSP different files will
be packaged.
Sure, I was proposing
-Original Message-
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Hart, Darren; Purdie, Richard; Wold, Saul; OE-core
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] imageconfigurator: a new recipe for
boottime image
On 28 August 2014 22:05, Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
Ohh, That is a good idea. Do you have any example recipe for me to look at
which is doing something similar?
It will just be a matter of imageconfigurator RRECOMMENDing
imageconfigurator-data, and then
It will just be a matter of imageconfigurator RRECOMMENDing
imageconfigurator-data, and then imageconfigurator-data being
machinearch and doing the per-machine magic however it wants.
Ross
I see. That means the recipe will be split into two recipes. It would be cool,
if it can be done
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
It will just be a matter of imageconfigurator RRECOMMENDing
imageconfigurator-data, and then imageconfigurator-data being
machinearch and doing the per-machine magic however it wants.
Ross
I see. That means the
I think this recipe is small enough so I don't think adding another one will
buy
anything...
Otavio, I agree with you here.
While on that, can you describe some use-cases you see which this can be
used to cover?
We have common BSPs in meta-intel such as intel-corei7-64 and
10 matches
Mail list logo
