Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] rm_work.bbclass: allow preserving additional content

2017-01-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello! Please ignored the 1/2 in the subject. There's just one patch for OE-core, the other one I had locally needs to go into meta-swupd. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] rm_work.bbclass: allow preserving additional content

2017-01-13 Thread Patrick Ohly
By default, do_rm_work either skips recipes entirely (when listed in RM_WORK_EXCLUDE) or removes everything except for temp. In meta-swupd, virtual image recipes collaborate on producing update data for the base recipe. Tasks running in the base recipe need some information from the virtual