On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 16:59, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
In Richard's email he proposed one or the other be set, why do you need to
set both here? If both need to be set then you don't need the override.
Because they're
Sync with OE at 3b7d83362027fde4f6850533ab83277d95dda961 however
without changing the way of generating the toolchain file and making
it branding agnostic.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
---
meta/classes/cmake.bbclass | 14 --
meta/classes/native.bbclass |
On 05/10/2011 07:51 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Sync with OE at 3b7d83362027fde4f6850533ab83277d95dda961 however
without changing the way of generating the toolchain file and making
it branding agnostic.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvadorota...@ossystems.com.br
---
meta/classes/cmake.bbclass |
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 16:59, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
In Richard's email he proposed one or the other be set, why do you need to
set both here? If both need to be set then you don't need the override.
Because they're different no? Otherwise native.bbclass has those for others