Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] cmake.bbclass: fix qmake and rpath issues

2011-05-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 16:59, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: In Richard's email he proposed one or the other be set, why do you need to set both here? If both need to be set then you don't need the override. Because they're

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] cmake.bbclass: fix qmake and rpath issues

2011-05-10 Thread Otavio Salvador
Sync with OE at 3b7d83362027fde4f6850533ab83277d95dda961 however without changing the way of generating the toolchain file and making it branding agnostic. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- meta/classes/cmake.bbclass | 14 -- meta/classes/native.bbclass |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] cmake.bbclass: fix qmake and rpath issues

2011-05-10 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/10/2011 07:51 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Sync with OE at 3b7d83362027fde4f6850533ab83277d95dda961 however without changing the way of generating the toolchain file and making it branding agnostic. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvadorota...@ossystems.com.br --- meta/classes/cmake.bbclass |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] cmake.bbclass: fix qmake and rpath issues

2011-05-10 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 16:59, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: In Richard's email he proposed one or the other be set, why do you need to set both here?  If both need to be set then you don't need the override. Because they're different no? Otherwise native.bbclass has those for others