On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> This is converging the recipes for go from
> meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
>
> Add recipes for go 1.7
>
> go.bbclass is added to ease out writing
> recipes for go packages
I took these for a spin with current mender tree. Mender is somewhat
i
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:35 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> > This is converging the recipes for go from
>>> > meta-virtualization and
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:35 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>
>> On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > This is converging the recipes for go from
>> > meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
>> >
>> I'm still of the opinion that this shou
On 8 February 2017 at 14:07, Jussi Kukkonen
wrote:
> On 8 February 2017 at 15:57, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>
>> I agree - if ruby is OE-core worthy, go most certainly is.
>>
>
> webkit-gtk needs ruby-native as a build dependency. If that wasn't the
> case ruby would almost certainly not be in oe-core
On 02/08/2017 03:57 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
FWIW I disagree. Go is a popular systems language and we're
increasingly supporting a wide-array of systems with OE
(from iot to ivi and beyond).
Go is already in wide enough use and duplicated in enough layers that
we would be doing folks a favour by
On 8 February 2017 at 15:57, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> I agree - if ruby is OE-core worthy, go most certainly is.
>
webkit-gtk needs ruby-native as a build dependency. If that wasn't the case
ruby would almost certainly not be in oe-core.
Jussi
--
___
Op
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:35 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
> > This is converging the recipes for go from
> > meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
> >
> I'm still of the opinion that this should be in meta-go, not oe-
> core...
>
> (but totally agree t
On 2017-02-08 14:53, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:35 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com>> wrote:
This is converging the recipes for go from
meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
I'm still of the opinion that this should be
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Joshua Lock
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:35 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
>
> On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> This is converging the recipes for go from
> meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
>
>
> I'm still of the opinion that this should be in
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:35 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
> > This is converging the recipes for go from
> >
> > meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
> >
>
> I'm still of the opinion that this should be in meta-go, not oe-
> core...
FWIW I disagree. Go
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 9:44:46 AM NZDT Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> > On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
>> >> This is converging the recipes for go from
>> >> meta-virtualization
On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 9:17:48 AM EST Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 9:44:46 AM NZDT Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Burton, Ross
wrote:
> > > On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >> This is converging the recipes for go from
> > >> met
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 9:44:46 AM NZDT Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> This is converging the recipes for go from
> >> meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
> >
> > I'm still of the opinion that this sh
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> This is converging the recipes for go from
>> meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
>
>
> I'm still of the opinion that this should be in meta-go, not oe-core...
>
I think we have to make mult
On 7 February 2017 at 04:24, Khem Raj wrote:
> This is converging the recipes for go from
> meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
>
I'm still of the opinion that this should be in meta-go, not oe-core...
(but totally agree that converging is essential)
Ross
--
___
This is converging the recipes for go from
meta-virtualization and oe-meta-go
Add recipes for go 1.7
go.bbclass is added to ease out writing
recipes for go packages
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
meta/classes/go.bbclass| 74 +++
meta/classes/goarch.bbclass
16 matches
Mail list logo
