Dnia piątek, 23 lutego 2024 10:36:27 CET Chen Qi via lists.openembedded.org
pisze:
> 1. I can see what this patch mainly does is ensuring groups first, then
> user, then groupmems. But the current useradd_preinst, which is called
> by useradd_sysroot has already ensured this. Is that not working?
1. I can see what this patch mainly does is ensuring groups first, then
user, then groupmems. But the current useradd_preinst, which is called
by useradd_sysroot has already ensured this. Is that not working?
2. You're using bb.warn as a method of outputting debugging information,
which I
Although I did notice the rest of the file uses this syntax,
and I do not believe there are any guidelines specific to this (that I am aware
of),
I did want to comment on this.
> + if test "x$1" = "xgroup"; then
> + if test "x$1" = "xuser"; then
> + if test "x$1" = "xgroupmems";
Dnia czwartek, 22 lutego 2024 16:02:47 CET Richard Purdie pisze:
> On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 14:53 +, Eilís 'pidge' Ní Fhlannagáin wrote:
> > From: Piotr Łobacz
> >
> > postinst-useradd-* haven't been running in order of dependency.
> >
> > This patch is reworked from Piotr Łobacz's patch and
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 14:53 +, Eilís 'pidge' Ní Fhlannagáin wrote:
> From: Piotr Łobacz
>
> postinst-useradd-* haven't been running in order of dependency.
>
> This patch is reworked from Piotr Łobacz's patch and fixes:
>
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15084
>
From: Piotr Łobacz
postinst-useradd-* haven't been running in order of dependency.
This patch is reworked from Piotr Łobacz's patch and fixes:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15084
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13904
It ensures that groups, users and
