Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 11/15] gcc-common.inc: Consider hardfp knob for configuring toolchain

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Khem, I've a concern about ending up with several different variables all doing the same thing. Why do we need both TARGET_FPU and ARM_FP_ABI? Couldn't we just have values or hard, sort or empty for TARGET_FPU? Cheers, Richard On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 18:32 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: From: Khem

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 11/15] gcc-common.inc: Consider hardfp knob for configuring toolchain

2011-05-16 Thread Koen Kooi
both softp and hardfp use the actual hardware fpu, but have different calling conventions and are incompatible. So you need vars. Op 16 mei 2011 om 16:44 heeft Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven: Hi Khem, I've a concern about ending up with several

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 11/15] gcc-common.inc: Consider hardfp knob for configuring toolchain

2011-05-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Hi Khem, I've a concern about ending up with several different variables all doing the same thing. Why do we need both TARGET_FPU and ARM_FP_ABI? Couldn't we just have values or hard, sort or empty for