On 02/05/2012 10:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
Dont use -q to grep we pipe to /dev/null anyway all we
care is the return status of grep
Signed-off-by: Khem Rajraj.k...@gmail.com
xxx
Signed-off-by: Khem Rajraj.k...@gmail.com
The patch seem valid, but the commit message needs to be cleaned up.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 04:40, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Dont use -q to grep we pipe to /dev/null anyway all we
care is the return status of grep
There're any reason to not use grep -q and drop the pipe?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 02/05/2012 10:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
Dont use -q to grep we pipe to /dev/null anyway all we
care is the return status of grep
Signed-off-by: Khem Rajraj.k...@gmail.com
xxx
Signed-off-by: Khem Rajraj.k...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
There're any reason to not use grep -q and drop the pipe?
yes. I dont need to know stderr along with stdio just return value is enough
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Dont use -q to grep we pipe to /dev/null anyway all we
care is the return status of grep
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
xxx
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
