On 11 August 2015 at 23:37, Otavio Salvador
otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 11 August 2015 at 20:54, Andre McCurdy armccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Is screen considered sufficiently core that we should maintain
On 10 August 2015 at 13:08, Jussi Kukkonen jussi.kukko...@intel.com wrote:
* Preserve the old 4.0.3 version (GPLv2+) and add new 4.3.1 (GPLv3+)
Is screen considered sufficiently core that we should maintain both GPLv2
and v3 recipes? I'm not convinced it is.
* Remove unused debian patch from
On 08/11/2015 09:54 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 10 August 2015 at 13:08, Jussi Kukkonen jussi.kukko...@intel.com wrote:
* Preserve the old 4.0.3 version (GPLv2+) and add new 4.3.1 (GPLv3+)
Is screen considered
On 11 August 2015 at 20:54, Andre McCurdy armccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Is screen considered sufficiently core that we should maintain both GPLv2
and v3 recipes? I'm not convinced it is.
Is it sufficiently core to be in oe-core at all?
Or maybe it's time to replace screen with tmux?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 10 August 2015 at 13:08, Jussi Kukkonen jussi.kukko...@intel.com wrote:
* Preserve the old 4.0.3 version (GPLv2+) and add new 4.3.1 (GPLv3+)
Is screen considered sufficiently core that we should maintain both GPLv2
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 11 August 2015 at 20:54, Andre McCurdy armccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Is screen considered sufficiently core that we should maintain both
GPLv2
and v3 recipes? I'm not convinced it is.
Is it sufficiently core to
On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:37 PM, Otavio Salvador
otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 11 August 2015 at 20:54, Andre McCurdy armccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Is screen considered sufficiently core that we should
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:08:21PM +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
The Debian diff in SRC_URI only added a debian/-directory in to the
source tree and did not modify upstream source: So it does nothing.
This commit removes the diff and does _not_ try to apply the 19000
lines of patches in
The Debian diff in SRC_URI only added a debian/-directory in to the
source tree and did not modify upstream source: So it does nothing.
This commit removes the diff and does _not_ try to apply the 19000
lines of patches in debian/patches. Any useful patches should be
added separately.
* Preserve
