Hi Alex,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:43:54PM +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 04:35 PM, Maxin B. John wrote:
> >>This is a good place to practice:
> >>http://regex101.com
> >
> >Thanks. I will update and send a v2.
>
> To save you a bit of time, I think the right construct should
On 02/12/2018 04:35 PM, Maxin B. John wrote:
This is a good place to practice:
http://regex101.com
Thanks. I will update and send a v2.
To save you a bit of time, I think the right construct should be either
(9|[0-8]\d+)
or
(?!9\d+)\d+
Alex
--
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:19:53PM +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 04:16 PM, Maxin B. John wrote:
> >In the case of fontconfig, version x.x.9x are release candidates
> >for next version.
> >+UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "fontconfig-(?P\d+\.\d+\.[^9]\d*).tar.gz"
>
> This will
On 02/12/2018 04:16 PM, Maxin B. John wrote:
In the case of fontconfig, version x.x.9x are release candidates
for next version.
+UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "fontconfig-(?P\d+\.\d+\.[^9]\d*).tar.gz"
This will incorrectly exclude x.x.9 which is not a release candidate.
You need to exclude "9
In the case of fontconfig, version x.x.9x are release candidates
for next version.
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John
---
meta/recipes-graphics/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.12.6.bb | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git