On 2016-12-07 06:50 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
With the attached patch, I see nothing else that is named in /tmp/
If you have the
On 2016-12-07 6:50 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
With the attached patch, I see nothing else that is named in /tmp/
If you have the
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>> With the attached patch, I see nothing else that is named in /tmp/
>>
>> If you have the cycles, can you give it a try and let me
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> With the attached patch, I see nothing else that is named in /tmp/
>
> If you have the cycles, can you give it a try and let me know ?
Yes, I'm giving it a whirl right now. Thanks!
--
On 2016-12-07 10:11 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
This patch does fix the raspberrypi issue, and it has been pushed, thankfully.
But I'm still seeing hard-coded filenames in /tmp that are messing up
the ability for more than one person to use a given build machine.
E.g.:
On 2016-12-07 10:11 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
This patch does fix the raspberrypi issue, and it has been pushed, thankfully.
But I'm still seeing hard-coded filenames in /tmp that are messing up
the ability for more than one person to use a given build machine.
E.g.:
This patch does fix the raspberrypi issue, and it has been pushed, thankfully.
But I'm still seeing hard-coded filenames in /tmp that are messing up
the ability for more than one person to use a given build machine.
E.g.:
/tmp/patch.standard.arm-versatile-926ejs.queue
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:14:41 +0100
Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 16:09 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > Lernel meta-data that has patches, but no branches, can trigger an
> > error due to no branch specific patch queue.
> >
> > This error then cascades to
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 16:09 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Lernel meta-data that has patches, but no branches, can trigger an
> error due to no branch specific patch queue.
>
> This error then cascades to more issues since the tools are using
> a named file in /tmp to store and display error
Lernel meta-data that has patches, but no branches, can trigger an
error due to no branch specific patch queue.
This error then cascades to more issues since the tools are using
a named file in /tmp to store and display error messages to the
user.
We fix both issues though the following kern
10 matches
Mail list logo