On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 17:49 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 17:04, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>
> > > Meanwhile I'd like to implement what I mentioned in note (1) in patch
> > > 4/9, as it's a real regression that I realized only today as I was
> > > preparing the patchset
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 17:04, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> > Meanwhile I'd like to implement what I mentioned in note (1) in patch
> > 4/9, as it's a real regression that I realized only today as I was
> > preparing the patchset for submission and now it's bothering me :)
>
> Yes, it is and I do
On Thu, 2023-12-14 at 18:28 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>
> > I not entirely happy about this since start_worker() executes processes
> > and isn't trivial. The code is careful enough to tear them down too at
> > exit but it is all a
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 15:39, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> I not entirely happy about this since start_worker() executes processes
> and isn't trivial. The code is careful enough to tear them down too at
> exit but it is all a bit of a waste of time.
>
> I had wondered if we can create
On Thu, 2023-12-14 at 14:45 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> printdiff needs setscene dependencies and they're available only
> through that object. Previously it was instantianted just after
> running printdiff, this moves the initilization to just prior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
>
printdiff needs setscene dependencies and they're available only
through that object. Previously it was instantianted just after
running printdiff, this moves the initilization to just prior.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5
