From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Currently, if a package QA type from package.bbclass is not listed in
ERROR_QA, it gets shown, regardless of whether it's in WARN_QA. This differs
from the behavior of the rest of the QA handling (which doesn't call
package_qa_handle_error at all if it's in neither _QA variable), and is
nonintuitive. Change this to use bb.note() if it's listed neither in ERROR_QA
nor WARN_QA, so it ends up in the task logs, but doesn't clutter up the user's
output.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
---
meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
index c091005..2b30538 100644
--- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass
@@ -143,9 +143,11 @@ def package_qa_handle_error(error_class, error_msg, d):
bb.error(QA Issue: %s % error_msg)
d.setVar(QA_SANE, False)
return False
-else:
+elif error_class in (d.getVar(WARN_QA, True) or ).split():
bb.warn(QA Issue: %s % error_msg)
-return True
+else:
+bb.note(QA Issue: %s % error_msg)
+return True
QAPATHTEST[libexec] = package_qa_check_libexec
def package_qa_check_libexec(path,name, d, elf, messages):
--
1.8.3
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
