No
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 7:36 AM Tim Orling wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:12 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM Tim Orling wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:51 AM Khem Raj wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This gets it building on architectures without
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:12 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM Tim Orling wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:51 AM Khem Raj wrote:
> >>
> >> This gets it building on architectures without 64bit atomics.
> >>
> >
> > We could also upgrade to
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:59 AM Tim Orling wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:51 AM Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> This gets it building on architectures without 64bit atomics.
>>
>
> We could also upgrade to python3-cryptography 42.0.5
> https://cryptography.io/en/latest/changelog/#v42-0-5
> Do
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:51 AM Khem Raj wrote:
> This gets it building on architectures without 64bit atomics.
>
>
We could also upgrade to python3-cryptography 42.0.5
https://cryptography.io/en/latest/changelog/#v42-0-5
Do we want to do that at this stage?
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> ---
>
This gets it building on architectures without 64bit atomics.
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
.../python/python3-cryptography-crates.inc| 22 ++--
...m-0.20.2-to-0.20.3-in-src-rust-10462.patch | 105 ++
.../python/python3-cryptography_42.0.2.bb | 1 +
3 files changed, 118
