Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-09 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 mei 2011, om 16:51 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: Op 6 mei 2011, om 16:20 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:39 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Now onto my issues: packaging: In OE .dev I added FILES_${PN} += ${base_libdir}/systemd to

[OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, The past few days I have gotten systemd to work in OE.dev and I have some questions on how to do in the oe-core universe. First some background: Systemd is a /sbin/init replacement using ideas from apples launchd like socket activation. Startup scripts are replaced by .ini like files:

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:51, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: So, is having both sets inside ${PN} a dealbreaker? I think it is not BUT this choice could be a distro choice. So I see as: USE_INIT=(sysv|systemd|both) Being both the default. -- Otavio Salvador                       

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 mei 2011, om 17:36 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:51, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: So, is having both sets inside ${PN} a dealbreaker? I think it is not BUT this choice could be a distro choice. Everything can be a distro