On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:23 AM, Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> From: Alexander Kanavin
>
> I believe the time has come to do this: openssl 1.0 upstream support stops at
> the end
> of 2019, and we do not want a situation where a supported YP release contains
> an
> unsupported version of a
we are good with fixes in master-next
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:54 AM Andre McCurdy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/OpenSSL-1.1 says it will cause runtime bugs like
> > segmentation faults or just misbehaving applications.
> >
> > On
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> https://wiki.debian.org/OpenSSL-1.1 says it will cause runtime bugs like
> segmentation faults or just misbehaving applications.
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:45 PM Andre McCurdy wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
https://wiki.debian.org/OpenSSL-1.1 says it will cause runtime bugs like
segmentation faults or just misbehaving applications.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:45 PM Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:45 AM Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:45 AM Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 10:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> > But patching the components to use libssl10 might actually work
>> > (unlike
>> > just changing DEPENDS to openssl10).
>> >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:45 AM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 10:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > But patching the components to use libssl10 might actually work
> > (unlike
> > just changing DEPENDS to openssl10).
> >
> > It's not only conflicting in build-time in RSS, but it
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 10:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> But patching the components to use libssl10 might actually work
> (unlike
> just changing DEPENDS to openssl10).
>
> It's not only conflicting in build-time in RSS, but it will conflict
> on target as well. You either need to migrate all
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:14:21AM +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> I am also disappointed to see that openssl10 does not help much,
> however, I do not believe we should wait another year, and hope the
> problem would take care of itself - this clearly did not happen over
> the past year. Let's
I am also disappointed to see that openssl10 does not help much,
however, I do not believe we should wait another year, and hope the
problem would take care of itself - this clearly did not happen over
the past year. Let's just look at failing recipes one by one and
investigate what needs to be
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:08 PM Andre McCurdy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 13:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> > I pointed this earlier before merge as well
> >> > meta-openembedded has 40 odd
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 13:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > I pointed this earlier before merge as well
>> > meta-openembedded has 40 odd recipes failing due to openssl 1.1
>> > upgrade
>>
>> Sorry, I think
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 13:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > I pointed this earlier before merge as well
> > meta-openembedded has 40 odd recipes failing due to openssl 1.1
> > upgrade
>
> Sorry, I think I missed something somewhere as I thought the
>
On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 13:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I pointed this earlier before merge as well
> meta-openembedded has 40 odd recipes failing due to openssl 1.1
> upgrade
Sorry, I think I missed something somewhere as I thought the
indications were the bigger problems like qt5 were working now
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 1:35 PM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 21:12 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:23 PM Alexander Kanavin > l.com> wrote:
> > > From: Alexander Kanavin
> > >
> > > I believe the time has come to do this: openssl 1.0 upstream
> > >
On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 21:12 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:23 PM Alexander Kanavin l.com> wrote:
> > From: Alexander Kanavin
> >
> > I believe the time has come to do this: openssl 1.0 upstream
> > support stops at the end
> > of 2019, and we do not want a situation
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:23 PM Alexander Kanavin
wrote:
> From: Alexander Kanavin
>
> I believe the time has come to do this: openssl 1.0 upstream support stops
> at the end
> of 2019, and we do not want a situation where a supported YP release
> contains an
> unsupported version of a
From: Alexander Kanavin
I believe the time has come to do this: openssl 1.0 upstream support stops at
the end
of 2019, and we do not want a situation where a supported YP release contains an
unsupported version of a critical security component.
Openssl 1.0 can still be utilized by depending on
17 matches
Mail list logo
