On 01/12/2021 21:33, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
This is a backport request for dunfell, while picking up only the
skeletal support for allowing mandatory dtschema handling for
device trees built through the kernel, introduced from kernel
version
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:39 PM Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 16:33 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Bhupesh Sharma
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a backport request for
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:39 PM Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 16:33 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Bhupesh Sharma
> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a backport request for dunfell, while picking up only the
> > >
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 16:33 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Bhupesh Sharma
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a backport request for dunfell, while picking up only the
> > skeletal support for allowing mandatory dtschema handling for
> > device trees built through the
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>
> This is a backport request for dunfell, while picking up only the
> skeletal support for allowing mandatory dtschema handling for
> device trees built through the kernel, introduced from kernel
> version 5.16 onwards.
The problem with
