For what it's worth, I don't have a strong opinion on this. Anyone who
still needs 1.0 as the primary openssl version can add the openssl10
recipe as 'openssl' to their private layers, and set PREFERRED_VERSION
accordingly.
Alex
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 19:56, Mark Hatle wrote:
>
> On 4/26/19 10:
On 4/26/19 10:50 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:31:03AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 4/26/19 12:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 03:18:47PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/25/19 2:28 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Would you consider this patch appropriat
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:31:03AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 4/26/19 12:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 03:18:47PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> On 4/25/19 2:28 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >>> Would you consider this patch appropriate now that warrior has branched?
> >>
> >>
On 4/26/19 12:12 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 03:18:47PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 4/25/19 2:28 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> Would you consider this patch appropriate now that warrior has branched?
>>
>> The use of OpenSSL10 as a 'second library' is likely no longer needed.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 03:18:47PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 4/25/19 2:28 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Would you consider this patch appropriate now that warrior has branched?
>
> The use of OpenSSL10 as a 'second library' is likely no longer needed. But
> OpenSSL 1.0 (as an alternative version
On 4/25/19 2:28 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Would you consider this patch appropriate now that warrior has branched?
The use of OpenSSL10 as a 'second library' is likely no longer needed. But
OpenSSL 1.0 (as an alternative version) to OpenSSL 1.1 is still needed in some
cases.. (FIPS-140-2)
So remo
Would you consider this patch appropriate now that warrior has branched?
Adrian
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:39:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 11:21:26PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > Perhaps you could grep meta-openembedded for openssl10? I do not have
> > access t
On 3/8/19 11:38 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:15:42PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>> This is premature. Plenty of recipes outside of oe-core still rely on
>> openssl10,
>> ...
> How many and which recipes actually?
>
> The upcoming releases of Debian and Ubuntu ship with
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 11:21:26PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Perhaps you could grep meta-openembedded for openssl10? I do not have access
> to a Linux machine for the next two weeks to check that, but I think there’s
> a few items there. Once meta-oe layers are free of openssl10 deps, the
Perhaps you could grep meta-openembedded for openssl10? I do not have access to
a Linux machine for the next two weeks to check that, but I think there’s a few
items there. Once meta-oe layers are free of openssl10 deps, there is a better
case for removing it.
Poky distro images have shipped wi
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:15:42PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> This is premature. Plenty of recipes outside of oe-core still rely on
> openssl10,
>...
How many and which recipes actually?
The upcoming releases of Debian and Ubuntu ship without OpenSSL 1.0.
> Alex
cu
Adrian
--
"I
11 matches
Mail list logo
