On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:46 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Right, it just starts to look rather ugly in the recipe, especially for
BSPs supporting more than just a couple of machines. I also think that
having to use machine overrides is an indicator that the mechanism is
not working for the purpose
On 05/27/2011 07:04 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:46 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Right, it just starts to look rather ugly in the recipe, especially for
BSPs supporting more than just a couple of machines. I also think that
having to use machine overrides is an indicator
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
In fact... why are the parens used at all?
No good reason. I would guess that we started off with something like
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = pdp11/(23|34)
in a recipe, and that got somehow generalised to wrapping all the
alternatives in parens
I think this is a good change. One comment below...
On May 26, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
oe-core does not define any machines, so it does not make sense to
add machine specific information in the oe-core u-boot recipe and
infrastructure. Also note that
On 05/26/2011 12:47 AM, Jason Kridner wrote:
I think this is a good change. One comment below...
On May 26, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
oe-core does not define any machines, so it does not make sense to
add machine specific information in the oe-core
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
-UBOOT_MACHINE ?= ${MACHINE}_config
+python () {
+ if not bb.data.getVar('UBOOT_MACHINE', d, 1):
+ bb.debug(To build %s, see u-boot_git.bb for instructions on \
If this file was renamed, don't you also want
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:50 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:02 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
COMPATIBLE_MACHINES is not easily extended due to
its regex syntax: (machine_a|machine_b), making it difficult to extend the
u-boot recipe in bbappend files without resorting to
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 15:37 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
u-boot in OE-Core would need something like COMPATIBLE_MACHINE =
which makes this harder.
Yes, true. I don't think that's a major problem, though, you just need
a regex that won't match anything. Something like:
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE =
On 05/26/2011 09:18 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 15:37 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
u-boot in OE-Core would need something like COMPATIBLE_MACHINE =
which makes this harder.
Yes, true. I don't think that's a major problem, though, you just need
a regex that won't match
oe-core does not define any machines, so it does not make sense to
add machine specific information in the oe-core u-boot recipe and
infrastructure. Also note that COMPATIBLE_MACHINES is not easily extended due to
its regex syntax: (machine_a|machine_b), making it difficult to extend the
u-boot
10 matches
Mail list logo