Hi,
I am a bit confused why busybox passwd does not work with daisy. It
used to work with dylan. When I try to use busybox passwd, I am
getting the following output:
passwd: applet not found
Is something wrong with the busybox maintainer script or somewhere
else? For instance, busybox pwd
On 20 May 2015 at 15:48, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 13:55, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused why busybox passwd does not work with daisy. It
used to work with dylan. When I try to use busybox passwd, I am
getting the
On 20 May 2015 at 13:55, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused why busybox passwd does not work with daisy. It
used to work with dylan. When I try to use busybox passwd, I am
getting the following output:
passwd: applet not found
is the password applet built?
Check
On May 20, 2015 5:36:55 PM GMT+02:00, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:20, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com
On 20 May 2015 at 17:20, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:09, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2015 5:36:55 PM GMT+02:00, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:20, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
On May 20, 2015 5:58:32 PM GMT+02:00, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Well, I understand and appreciate that opinions vary, but if busybox
had shipped 3 binaries at the end of the build processes, then their
naming would be standard led by busybox upstream. Currently, there
is no way to
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:20, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:09, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On
On 20 May 2015 at 16:02, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On a second thought: is even worse now than that, our code has to
handle _three_ different scenarios:
1) Desktop.
2) Embedded without Yocto or embedded with old Yocto.
3) Embedded with new Yocto.
I do not get excited about this.
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:02, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On a second thought: is even worse now than that, our code has to
handle _three_ different scenarios:
1) Desktop.
2) Embedded without Yocto or embedded with
[Cc'ing Chen who invented it for the most part]
On 20 May 2015 at 17:02, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 15:50, Laszlo Papp
On 20 May 2015 at 17:09, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:02, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On a second thought: is even worse now than that, our code has to
handle _three_ different scenarios:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:09, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:02, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On a second
On 20 May 2015 at 15:42, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Now that just breaks all the code that our software is using. Why did
this binary incompatible change sneak in, and especially: why without
any note in the migration guide? Furthermore, is there a way to
reverse this? I really would
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 15:42, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Now that just breaks all the code that our software is using. Why did
this binary incompatible change sneak in, and especially: why without
any note in the
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 15:50, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Currently, I do not see any simple way without #ifdef jungle in the
code around to it. It is
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 15:48, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 13:55, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused why busybox passwd does not work with
On 20 May 2015 at 15:50, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Currently, I do not see any simple way without #ifdef jungle in the
code around to it. It is not nice.
Looking at the busybox recipe reveals this:
# Whether to split the suid apps into a seperate binary
BUSYBOX_SPLIT_SUID ?= 1
Just
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 15:50, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Currently, I do not see any simple way without #ifdef jungle in the
code around to it. It is not nice.
Looking at the busybox recipe reveals this:
#
19 matches
Mail list logo
