On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:34 AM Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>
> > Packaging format of the host distribution and packaging format used
> > by yocto have no relation even if there is package management on
> > real targets. Why is there an assumption
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 at 18:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > all of this being accurate, the one advantage i can see is that, if
> > developers are familiar with deb package management on their ubuntu
> > dev systems, then they would be familiar
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 at 18:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> all of this being accurate, the one advantage i can see is that, if
> developers are familiar with deb package management on their ubuntu
> dev systems, then they would be familiar with having package
> management on their target systems
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Packaging format of the host distribution and packaging format used
> by yocto have no relation even if there is package management on
> real targets. Why is there an assumption that matching them is going
> to help something?
>
> If anything,
Packaging format of the host distribution and packaging format used by
yocto have no relation even if there is package management on real targets.
Why is there an assumption that matching them is going to help something?
If anything, making them match might prompt misguided attempts to install
yet another sophomoric question but i have inherited (and am
babysitting) a fairly extensive OE/YP build system that, for the most
part, works but i noticed early on that it selects ipk for the package
format.
now, given that there is no package management installed in the
images, i guess it
