Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:10:42AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:37 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:42:52AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > there is also another source of many ssta

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:37 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:42:52AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > there is also another source of many sstate rebuilds. I've discuessed > > > this with RP on IRC already and I'll

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:42:52AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > there is also another source of many sstate rebuilds. I've discuessed > > this with RP on IRC already and I'll fill bugs as recommended, sharing > > here just because you hav

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > there is also another source of many sstate rebuilds. I've discuessed > this with RP on IRC already and I'll fill bugs as recommended, sharing > here just because you have opened this topic. > > If you have package with > PACKAGE_ARCH = "all

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 08:34 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Thanks for looking into this! For the time being I'll work around it with: > > oen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-angstrom$ git diff conf/distro/ > diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-core-tweaks.inc > b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:20:02PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > This bug gets reintroduced every other week, so let's try to fix it properly > this time. The situation: > > 2 machines (beagleboard, pandaboard) using the same base architecture > (armv7a). > > step 0: rm build pseudone -rf

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-16 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 17 mei 2011, om 01:13 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> This bug gets reintroduced every other week, so let's try to fix it >> properly this time. The situation: >> >> 2 machines (beagleboard, pandaboard) using the same base

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > This bug gets reintroduced every other week, so let's try to fix it > properly this time. The situation: > > 2 machines (beagleboard, pandaboard) using the same base architecture > (armv7a). > > step 0: rm build pseudone -rf > step 1: MACHINE=

[OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-16 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, This bug gets reintroduced every other week, so let's try to fix it properly this time. The situation: 2 machines (beagleboard, pandaboard) using the same base architecture (armv7a). step 0: rm build pseudone -rf step 1: MACHINE=beagleboard bitbake console-image step 2: MACHINE=omap4430-pan