Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-14 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:21 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I got to it finally. Normally /var/lib/rpm is absent when opkg is in use, > but when /usr/bin/rpm is present, python3's ptest involves distutils test > creating rpm packages (and presumably installing them too), which creates a > databas

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-14 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I got to it finally. Normally /var/lib/rpm is absent when opkg is in use, but when /usr/bin/rpm is present, python3's ptest involves distutils test creating rpm packages (and presumably installing them too), which creates a database in /var/lib/rpm, which then triggers rpm tests to run and fail. So

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-14 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 08:15, Khem Raj wrote: > local.conf I have > > DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " largefile opengl ptest multiarch wayland pam > polkit " > IMAGE_CLASSES += "testimage testsdk" > Right, I'm running this now, it's a bit tricky because I have to do it on the Yocto AB. Big company's

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:05 PM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 02:40, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> >> autobuilder runs poky, to reproduce this you will need to use >> oe-core+bitbake checkout >> >> and then for qemux86-64 >> >> bitbake -ctestimage core-image-sato-sdk-ptest > > > If

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 02:40, Khem Raj wrote: > > autobuilder runs poky, to reproduce this you will need to use > oe-core+bitbake checkout > > and then for qemux86-64 > > bitbake -ctestimage core-image-sato-sdk-ptest > If I set up a nodistro build, ptest packages are no longer available and buil

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 2:05 PM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 22:37, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> >>> Merging these patches will exclude rpm from images, and so will mask the >>> issue, so it's not orthogonal. >> >> >> are you actively working to fix the test case ? >> In that c

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 22:37, Khem Raj wrote: > >> Merging these patches will exclude rpm from images, and so will mask the >> issue, so it's not orthogonal. >> > > are you actively working to fix the test case ? > In that case it would be justified to hold them > The test case that is failing f

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:52 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 17:44, Khem Raj wrote: > >> I'd like to request that these two are held back until we figure out what > is going wrong with the rpm test (see separate thread). > We already know what’s going on wh

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 17:44, Khem Raj wrote: > I'd like to request that these two are held back until we figure out what is going wrong with the rpm test (see separate thread). >>> >>> We already know what’s going on what more >>> Do you want to know ? >>> >> >> As the rpm maintainer,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:19 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 17:07, Khem Raj wrote: > >> >>> I'd like to request that these two are held back until we figure out >>> what is going wrong with the rpm test (see separate thread). >>> >> >> We already know what’s going on what m

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 17:07, Khem Raj wrote: > >> I'd like to request that these two are held back until we figure out what >> is going wrong with the rpm test (see separate thread). >> > > We already know what’s going on what more > Do you want to know ? > As the rpm maintainer, yes I do. The

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:21 AM Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 07:38, Khem Raj wrote: > >> libsolv: Enable rpm packageconfig by default only if rpm O_P_M is >> enabled >> dnf,libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm >> > > I'd like to request that these two

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 07:38, Khem Raj wrote: > libsolv: Enable rpm packageconfig by default only if rpm O_P_M is > enabled > dnf,libdnf: Ignore if PACKAGE_CLASSES does not have rpm > I'd like to request that these two are held back until we figure out what is going wrong with the rpm te

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] recipe updates, testing fixes

2020-02-12 Thread Khem Raj
- Update gdb to 9.1 and musl to latest - Fix packages busybox, ltp to build with musl exposed 64bit time_t problems - rest of all fixes are found testing core-image-sato-sdk on qemuarm/qemux86_64 - Add a check for gold being used on rv32/rv64 The following changes since commit 34535f3e0ca6f6e3