Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-20 Thread Marek Vasut
On 10/20/2016 12:13 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 19 October 2016 at 23:53, Marek Vasut > wrote: > > OK, snap. Can you pick 1,2,3,5 so I don't have to resubmit them ? They > should apply cleanly and they are pretty orthogonal from the 4/5. > > > 1 is standalone and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 October 2016 at 23:53, Marek Vasut wrote: > OK, snap. Can you pick 1,2,3,5 so I don't have to resubmit them ? They > should apply cleanly and they are pretty orthogonal from the 4/5. > 1 is standalone and I've merged this into ross/mut already, but 3/4/5 are all basically fixing problems i

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-19 Thread Marek Vasut
On 10/19/2016 11:39 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 19 October 2016 at 22:15, Denys Dmytriyenko > wrote: > > > > But do we need to bump PE to ensure upgrade path and proper sorting? > > > > I don't think so, since the whole U-Boot version got updated. > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-19 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 October 2016 at 22:15, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > But do we need to bump PE to ensure upgrade path and proper sorting? > > > > I don't think so, since the whole U-Boot version got updated. > > Still, v.YY will always sort higher than .YY no matter what digits > there are. That's

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-19 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:00:02PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/19/2016 10:10 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot > >> version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm"

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-19 Thread Marek Vasut
On 10/19/2016 10:10 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot >> version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the >> PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated by

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-19 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:09:26PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 10/19/2016 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot > >version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the > >PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated by

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-19 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot > version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the > PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated by removing the leading 'v'. Finally! But do we need to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-19 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 10/19/2016 12:55 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated by removing the leading 'v'. Don't drop the 'v'. Package versions need to mo

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] u-boot: Drop PV altogether

2016-10-18 Thread Marek Vasut
Drop the explicit setting of PV altogether. This changes the U-Boot version string from "v20yy.mm" to "20yy.mm" , so layer setting the PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot must be updated by removing the leading 'v'. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut Cc: Richard Purdie Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko --- meta/recipes-bsp/