Hi Christopher,
Thanks for applying the required changes under below commit,
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/compare/master...kergoth:connman-systemd-nfs
Are there any plans to submit it to OE-core?
Regards,
Jagadeesh
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Jagadeesh
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Andreas Oberritter
wrote:
> Hi Jagadeesh,
>
> On 11.10.2016 14:11, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> >
> >
> > I think this is too fragile to land in OE-Core. What happens if a
>
On 12.10.2016 19:49, Christopher Larson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Andreas Oberritter
> > wrote:
>
> On 11.10.2016 21:34, Christopher Larson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jagadeesh
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Andreas Oberritter
wrote:
> On 11.10.2016 21:34, Christopher Larson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa
> > >
> wrote:
> >
> > On
Hi Chistopher,
On 11.10.2016 21:34, Christopher Larson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa
> > wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Christopher Larson
>
Hi Jagadeesh,
On 11.10.2016 14:11, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>
>
> I think this is too fragile to land in OE-Core. What happens if a
> network driver prints "device=eth0"? Or if other kernel messages make
> the string
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <
jkrishnanjana...@mvista.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Christopher Larson
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <
>> jkrishnanjana...@mvista.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Christopher Larson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <
> jkrishnanjana...@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>>
>>
>>> I think this is too fragile to land in OE-Core. What happens if a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa <
jkrishnanjana...@mvista.com> wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>
>
>> I think this is too fragile to land in OE-Core. What happens if a
>> network driver prints "device=eth0"? Or if other kernel messages make
>> the string
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> I think this is too fragile to land in OE-Core. What happens if a
> network driver prints "device=eth0"? Or if other kernel messages make
> the string disappear from dmesg and connman gets restarted later?
>
True. If device=eth0 gets
Dear Jagadeesh,
On 10.10.2016 19:35, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote:
> Following are the drawbacks with the current logic:
> 1. If ip=dhcp in the boot command line, then the
> current code makes connman to ignore "eth0" network interface
> from managing internet connections. This can cause NFS
11 matches
Mail list logo