Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rpcbind: Security Advisory - rpcbind - CVE-2015-7236

2015-11-24 Thread akuster808


On 11/18/2015 02:50 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 18 November 2015 at 01:44, akuster808  wrote:
> 
>> Can we get the CVE mentioned in the patch or rename the the patch to
>> include the CVE #.
>>
> 
> I'd already merged this into mut, so have renamed the patch.

thanks.

- armin
> 
> Ross
> 
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rpcbind: Security Advisory - rpcbind - CVE-2015-7236

2015-11-18 Thread Burton, Ross
On 18 November 2015 at 01:44, akuster808  wrote:

> Can we get the CVE mentioned in the patch or rename the the patch to
> include the CVE #.
>

I'd already merged this into mut, so have renamed the patch.

Ross
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rpcbind: Security Advisory - rpcbind - CVE-2015-7236

2015-11-17 Thread akuster808
Li Zhou,

Can we get the CVE mentioned in the patch or rename the the patch to
include the CVE #.

regards,
Armin

On 11/16/2015 11:18 PM, wenzong@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Li Zhou 
> 
> rpcbind: Fix memory corruption in PMAP_CALLIT code
> 
> Use-after-free vulnerability in xprt_set_caller in rpcb_svc_com.c in
> rpcbind 0.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of
> service (daemon crash) via crafted packets, involving a PMAP_CALLIT
> code.
> 
> The patch comes from
> , and it hasn't
> been in rpcbind upstream yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhou 
> Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan 
> ---
>  ...Fix_memory_corruption_in_PMAP_CALLIT_code.patch | 83 
> ++
>  meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind_0.2.3.bb |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind/rpcbind_Fix_memory_corruption_in_PMAP_CALLIT_code.patch
> 
> diff --git 
> a/meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind/rpcbind_Fix_memory_corruption_in_PMAP_CALLIT_code.patch
>  
> b/meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind/rpcbind_Fix_memory_corruption_in_PMAP_CALLIT_code.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..f156290
> --- /dev/null
> +++ 
> b/meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind/rpcbind_Fix_memory_corruption_in_PMAP_CALLIT_code.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
> +commit 06f7ebb1dade2f0dbf872ea2bedf17cff4734bdd
> +Author: Olaf Kirch 
> +Date:   Thu Aug 6 16:27:20 2015 +0200
> +
> +Fix memory corruption in PMAP_CALLIT code
> +
> + - A PMAP_CALLIT call comes in on IPv4 UDP
> + - rpcbind duplicates the caller's address to a netbuf and stores it in
> +   FINFO[0].caller_addr. caller_addr->buf now points to a memory region A
> +   with a size of 16 bytes
> + - rpcbind forwards the call to the local service, receives a reply
> + - when processing the reply, it does this in xprt_set_caller:
> + xprt->xp_rtaddr = *FINFO[0].caller_addr
> +   It sends out the reply, and then frees the netbuf caller_addr and
> +   caller_addr.buf.
> +   However, it does not clear xp_rtaddr, so xp_rtaddr.buf now refers
> +   to memory region A, which is free.
> + - When the next call comes in on the UDP/IPv4 socket, svc_dg_recv will
> +   be called, which will set xp_rtaddr to the client's address.
> +   It will reuse the buffer inside xp_rtaddr, ie it will write a
> +   sockaddr_in to region A
> +
> +Some time down the road, an incoming TCP connection is accepted,
> +allocating a fresh SVCXPRT. The memory region A is inside the
> +new SVCXPRT
> +
> + - While processing the TCP call, another UDP call comes in, again
> +   overwriting region A with the client's address
> + - TCP client closes connection. In svc_destroy, we now trip over
> +   the garbage left in region A
> +
> +We ran into the case where a commercial scanner was triggering
> +occasional rpcbind segfaults. The core file that was captured showed
> +a corrupted xprt->xp_netid pointer that was really a sockaddr_in.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch 
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Backport
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Li Zhou 
> +---
> + src/rpcb_svc_com.c |   23 ++-
> + 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +
> +Index: rpcbind-0.1.6+git20080930/src/rpcb_svc_com.c
> +===
> +--- rpcbind-0.1.6+git20080930.orig/src/rpcb_svc_com.c
>  rpcbind-0.1.6+git20080930/src/rpcb_svc_com.c
> +@@ -1298,12 +1298,33 @@ check_rmtcalls(struct pollfd *pfds, int
> + return (ncallbacks_found);
> + }
> + 
> ++/*
> ++ * This is really a helper function defined in libtirpc, but unfortunately, 
> it hasn't
> ++ * been exported yet.
> ++ */
> ++static struct netbuf *
> ++__rpc_set_netbuf(struct netbuf *nb, const void *ptr, size_t len)
> ++{
> ++if (nb->len != len) {
> ++if (nb->len)
> ++mem_free(nb->buf, nb->len);
> ++nb->buf = mem_alloc(len);
> ++if (nb->buf == NULL)
> ++return NULL;
> ++
> ++nb->maxlen = nb->len = len;
> ++}
> ++memcpy(nb->buf, ptr, len);
> ++return nb;
> ++}
> ++
> + static void
> + xprt_set_caller(SVCXPRT *xprt, struct finfo *fi)
> + {
> ++const struct netbuf *caller = fi->caller_addr;
> + u_int32_t *xidp;
> + 
> +-*(svc_getrpccaller(xprt)) = *(fi->caller_addr);
> ++__rpc_set_netbuf(svc_getrpccaller(xprt), caller->buf, caller->len);
> + xidp = __rpcb_get_dg_xidp(xprt);
> + *xidp = fi->caller_xid;
> + }
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind_0.2.3.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind_0.2.3.bb
> index 237018b..9b1c650 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/rpcbind/rpcbind_0.2.3.bb
> +++