On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 21:21 -0500, Patrick Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:01:01PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >
> > On 14 September 2016 at 18:12, Patrick Williams
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > mkfs.minix and fsck.minix are likely rarely used, so split
> > > them into their own pack
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:01:01PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 14 September 2016 at 18:12, Patrick Williams wrote:
>
> > mkfs.minix and fsck.minix are likely rarely used, so split
> > them into their own packages to reduce the footprint of
> > util-linux. This follows the pattern of cramfs s
On 14 September 2016 at 18:12, Patrick Williams wrote:
> mkfs.minix and fsck.minix are likely rarely used, so split
> them into their own packages to reduce the footprint of
> util-linux. This follows the pattern of cramfs support
> within util-linux.
>
Minix is so unlikely to be used, why don'
