Alright, finally got around to this again. Patch rebased, and passing
tests.
--
Kristian
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On 16/02/17 12:40, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> Hi Kristian,
>
> Thank you for the patch. It looks good to me. Just one thing needs to be
> changed. See my comment below.
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:30:12AM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote:
>> We don't need the gap that the extended partition occupies if we
Hi Kristian,
Thank you for the patch. It looks good to me. Just one thing needs to be
changed. See my comment below.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:30:12AM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote:
> We don't need the gap that the extended partition occupies if we
> already know that we have less than five partit
On 14 February 2017 at 14:46, Kristian Amlie
wrote:
> Ping. Patch still applies, should be a very easy change.
>
The consolidated pull I just sent has a large refactoring series in, can
you rebase this on top of that?
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core ma
Ping. Patch still applies, should be a very easy change.
--
Kristian
On 27/01/17 07:51, Kristian Amlie wrote:
> We don't need the gap that the extended partition occupies if we
> already know that we have less than five partitions. Saves up to one
> full alignment of space.
>
> Signed-off-by: