Ross,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Nicolas Dechesne
nicolas.deche...@linaro.org wrote:
oops. you're right. it's fixed in both dora and master. in fact i got
hit by that on dylan... but they i switched to dora anyways... so this
one is fine.
I guess i spoke too quickly... i just retried a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 04:27:04PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 17:09 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:41:11PM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 24 February 2014 15:27, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we start by adding
include
On 26 February 2014 19:11, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it supposed to work correctly in incremental builds? Today I've seen
couple of components failing in do_configure and building fine after
manual clean, interesting part of log is that autotools.bbclass was
actually trying
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 19:54 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
Unless, of course, you work out where configure is looking to bail on
this test, and if we can safely remove it on rebuilds.
I don't think there's any safe way of defeating that configure check
other than to properly clean ${S}. You could
On 25 February 2014 05:46, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
b) We introduce an autotools2 class and have recipes inherit that.
This version would default to separate builddirs. It does mean change to
all the good recipes rather than the broken ones though and hence a
fair bit of churn.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 25 February 2014 05:46, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
b) We introduce an autotools2 class and have recipes inherit that.
This version would default to separate builddirs. It does mean change to
all the good
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
That list is opt-in and mainly covers oe-core, so this gets tested
every time the YP autobuilder does a world build. We need a meta-oe
world build where autotools.bbclass sets B=${WORKDIR}/build: it's
literally just
On 25 February 2014 17:36, Nicolas Dechesne nicolas.deche...@linaro.org wrote:
right. I have recently (on dora) noticed that mesa build is broken
when using separate build dir, i have the following extra config:
PACKAGECONFIG_append = gallium gallium-egl gallium-gbm gallium-llvm
since
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 25 February 2014 17:36, Nicolas Dechesne nicolas.deche...@linaro.org
wrote:
right. I have recently (on dora) noticed that mesa build is broken
when using separate build dir, i have the following extra config:
Hello Richard,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
For a while poky and others have been using the seperatebuilddir.inc
file. This makes ${S} != ${B} and means that ${B} can be wiped when
configuration changes.
This helps deal with the
On 24 February 2014 15:27, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we start by adding
include conf/distro/include/seperatebuilddir.inc
to
conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf
? so that more people start using it and possibly report issues in their
builds?
That list is opt-in and mainly
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:41:11PM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 24 February 2014 15:27, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we start by adding
include conf/distro/include/seperatebuilddir.inc
to
conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf
? so that more people start using it and possibly
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 17:09 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:41:11PM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 24 February 2014 15:27, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we start by adding
include conf/distro/include/seperatebuilddir.inc
to
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
For a while poky and others have been using the seperatebuilddir.inc
file. This makes ${S} != ${B} and means that ${B} can be wiped when
configuration changes.
This helps deal with the fact that
14 matches
Mail list logo
