Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and linux-libc-headers are again going backwards

2016-10-12 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:55:00PM +1100, Jonathan Liu wrote: > On 12 October 2016 at 23:18, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:54:22AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> Either use 4.7.99+4.8-rc4 like most other recipes do or at least "4.8~rc4" > >> which

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and linux-libc-headers are again going backwards

2016-10-12 Thread Jonathan Liu
On 12 October 2016 at 23:18, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:54:22AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Either use 4.7.99+4.8-rc4 like most other recipes do or at least "4.8~rc4" >> which might sort lower than "4.8" (but needs to be verified for all >>

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and linux-libc-headers are again going backwards

2016-10-12 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:54:22AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Either use 4.7.99+4.8-rc4 like most other recipes do or at least "4.8~rc4" > which might sort lower than "4.8" (but needs to be verified for all > packaging backends first). > > Ignoring all this completely results with what we can

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and linux-libc-headers are again going backwards

2016-10-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:07 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Oct 6, 2016, at 2:27 AM, Richard Purdie > ndation.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > > > Either use 4.7.99+4.8-rc4 like most other recipes do or at least > >

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and linux-libc-headers are again going backwards

2016-10-06 Thread Khem Raj
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 2:27 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Either use 4.7.99+4.8-rc4 like most other recipes do or at least >> "4.8~rc4" >> which might sort lower than "4.8" (but needs to be verified

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and linux-libc-headers are again going backwards

2016-10-06 Thread Burton, Ross
On 6 October 2016 at 10:27, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I wish we knew for certain whether ~ works properly everywhere. A good > case for some unittests I guess... > I own the bug for that and there's actually a start at this in poky-contrib. The problem is

Re: [OE-core] linux-yocto and linux-libc-headers are again going backwards

2016-10-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:54 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Either use 4.7.99+4.8-rc4 like most other recipes do or at least > "4.8~rc4" > which might sort lower than "4.8" (but needs to be verified for all > packaging backends first). > > Ignoring all this completely results with what we can see in