On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 6:09 PM Alistair Francis
wrote:
> I raised the regression on the QEMU mailing list while I was preparing
> the revert for QEMU and Palmer pointed out this diff for musl:
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv64/atomic_arch.h b/arch/riscv64/atomic_arch.h
> index c9765342..41ad4d04
I raised the regression on the QEMU mailing list while I was preparing
the revert for QEMU and Palmer pointed out this diff for musl:
diff --git a/arch/riscv64/atomic_arch.h b/arch/riscv64/atomic_arch.h
index c9765342..41ad4d04 100644
--- a/arch/riscv64/atomic_arch.h
+++
Please send a patch
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:58 PM Alistair Francis wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:11 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:39 PM Alistair Francis
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 17:59 -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 23,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:11 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:39 PM Alistair Francis
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 17:59 -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> > > > Alistair,
> > > >
> > > > OE-core qemu upgrade to 4.1
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:39 PM Alistair Francis
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 17:59 -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> > > Alistair,
> > >
> > > OE-core qemu upgrade to 4.1 has ended up with regressing musl/riscv
> > > port. I could pin point
On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 17:59 -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> > Alistair,
> >
> > OE-core qemu upgrade to 4.1 has ended up with regressing musl/riscv
> > port. I could pin point it to
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
> Alistair,
>
> OE-core qemu upgrade to 4.1 has ended up with regressing musl/riscv
> port. I could pin point it to
>
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=50a7dec95618080962e56fd347f505e691b7ad6f
>
> it works fine with 4.0,
