Hi,
?= is better fit here.
It's because there is only one option ?
Do you want me to repost patch?
The problem is that it is already on meta-openembedded git master-next branch.
Matthieu
-Message d'origine-
De : openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:36:05AM +, Matthieu CRAPET wrote:
Hi,
?= is better fit here.
It's because there is only one option ?
Do you want me to repost patch?
The problem is that it is already on meta-openembedded git master-next branch.
I'll amend it there (it's faster for me than
Thank you!
-Message d'origine-
De : openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] De la part de Martin
Jansa
Envoyé : mardi 25 mars 2014 08:55
À : openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Objet : Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH]
lvm2 depends on readline, CPPFunction has been replaced by rl_completion_func_t
in recent readline,
Error log:
| lvm.c: In function 'lvm_shell':
| lvm.c:189:38: error: 'CPPFunction' undeclared (first use in this function)
| rl_attempted_completion_function = (CPPFunction *) _completion;
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zhenhua Luo schreef op 25-03-14 11:14:
lvm2 depends on readline, CPPFunction has been replaced by
rl_completion_func_t in recent readline,
Error log: | lvm.c: In function 'lvm_shell': | lvm.c:189:38: error:
'CPPFunction' undeclared (first use in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador schreef op 24-03-14 15:49:
From: Prabhu Sundararaj prabhu.sundara...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Prabhu Sundararaj prabhu.sundara...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br ---
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador schreef op 24-03-14 15:49:
From: Prabhu Sundararaj prabhu.sundara...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Prabhu Sundararaj prabhu.sundara...@freescale.com
From: Prabhu Sundararaj prabhu.sundara...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Prabhu Sundararaj prabhu.sundara...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
---
.../{gnome-desktop3_3.0.2.bb = gnome-desktop3_3.4.2.bb} | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4
Hi
I am trying to build LLVM from the cloudsuite benchmark. However, when I type
command make inside the folder llvm-2.9, I am getting error:
Intercept.cpp:69:67: error: ‘lseek64’ was not declared in this scope. I have
search and it is suggested to add #include unistd.h into Intercept.cpp
exo-native (one of xfce4-taskmanager deps) was the point of failure. More
specifically, exo-native was failing during configuration time. I
discovered that, on master-next, exo-native build finishes by reverting
this commit in
Pings
Thanks,
chunrong
-Original Message-
From: b40...@freescale.com [mailto:b40...@freescale.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:44 PM
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Liu Ting-B28495; Luo Zhenhua-B19537; Guo Chunrong-B40290
Subject: [meta-networking][PATCH ]
11 matches
Mail list logo