On Thursday 04 September 2014 15:12:02 Burton, Ross wrote:
Quick question of style for the community to bikeshed on: in the
general case should recipes be split into foo_1.2.bb and foo.inc, or
should they only split to bb/inc if there are multiple versions and
generally there should just be
Hi Otavio,
Thanks for your reply.
I have applied the patch, now it is fetching qtwayland_git.bb but it is
giving error as shown log file in below link.
http://pastebin.com/mzqsp6Nh
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:10
Hi Otavio,
Thanks for your reply.
I have applied the patch, now it is fetching qtwayland_git.bb but it is
giving error for do unpack as shown in below link and
qtwayland-native_git.bb is not going to fetch.
http://pastebin.com/dk2gFin0
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Switesh Fulpagare
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Switesh Fulpagare
switesh.fulpag...@mindastoneridge.com wrote:
Hi Otavio,
Thanks for your reply.
I have applied the patch, now it is fetching qtwayland_git.bb but it is
giving error for do unpack as shown in below link and
qtwayland-native_git.bb is not
On 09/04/2014 07:29 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 4 September 2014 15:12, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
Quick question of style for the community to bikeshed on: in the
general case should recipes be split
In order to allow the building of gems we have created a
ruby.bbclass. The building of gems is much like the building of python
packages in that we rely on building up -native gems in order to
facilitate the cross compiling of the gems that will be built for the
target. When dependencies exist
For a while now we have had functionality in meta-cloud-services in
Yocto to assist in building Ruby gems in to the rootfs images. Many of
these gems and the ruby.bbclass that was written to facilitate the
building of gems are not specific to our work in meta-cloud-services
and should be made more
On 5 September 2014 14:58, Mike Looijmans mike.looijm...@topic.nl wrote:
Why not take it one step further and remove the version from the bb
filename? Only use the versioned filename if there actually is more than
one version.
I wonder what happens if there are multiple layers in place that
These patches are no longer used or needed anywhere. Chromium 35 is now
obsolete, since Chromium 37.0.2062.94 is the new stable version.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rafael Giani d...@pseudoterminal.org
---
.../0001-Disable-ANGLE-commit-ID-generation.patch | 71 -
Hi Otavio,
Thanks for your mail.
Yes, Otavio you are right.
There is / at the end of DL_DIR in the local.conf file.
I had removed that and once again given bitbake meta-toolchain-qt5
but as result as earlier. See the link below.
http://pastebin.com/a8VjfKXh
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:29
10 matches
Mail list logo
