[oe] meta-openembedded "toolchain-layer" is broken

If you happen to have "toolchain-layer" in your bblayer list, it will trigger this: ERROR: ExpansionError during parsing .../meta-oe/toolchain-layer/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.6.bb: Failure expanding variable SRCPV, expression was ${@bb.fetch2.get_srcrev(d)} which triggered

Re: [oe] [PATCH][meta-oe] freerdp: get out of "nonworking", fix build, improve

> On Oct 6, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:58:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Manuel Bachmann >> wrote: >>> We make the "freerdp" recipe active again, fix the build >>>

Re: [oe] Multiple bbappends and their order

> On Oct 7, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Angelika Tobisch wrote: > > Hello, > > suppose I have layers A, B, and C. Layer A provides a recipe. I want > to append this recipe in both layers B and C. > > In what order are the appends going to be applied? Is it > deterministic? Does

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH V2 2/2] libnetfilter: Avoid using VLAs

VLAs in composite data types like structures and unions are not a standard feature of C language, gcc has specific implementations for but other compilers dont have that done specifically clang, and the community refuses to implement it since its non standard. Change-Id:

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] netmap-modules: fix compilation failure

If CONFIG_IXGBE is enabled in kernel. This package fails to build with error messages like below. | #error "unsupported ixgbe driver version" | ^ ... error: request for member 'count' in something not a structure or union | na.num_rx_desc = NM_IXGBE_RX_RING(adapter, 0)->count; |

[oe] [PATCH] netmap-modules: fix compilation failure

If CONFIG_IXGBE is enabled in kernel. This package fails to build with error messages like below. | #error "unsupported ixgbe driver version" | ^ ... error: request for member 'count' in something not a structure or union | na.num_rx_desc = NM_IXGBE_RX_RING(adapter, 0)->count; |

[oe] [PATCH 2/2][meta-oe] libcap-ng: remove package

From: Wenzong Fan libcap-ng 0.7.7 has been added to oe-core: ad509d7644803ff9386affefe2ec1a3664027074 Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan --- .../libcap-ng/libcap-ng/python.patch | 58 --

[oe] [PATCH 0/2][meta-oe] remove packages: libcap-ng, swig

From: Wenzong Fan They have been moved to oe-core. The following changes since commit f4533380c8a5c1d229f69ee0c2ef9d187ef8: dracut: install modules to /usr/lib (2015-09-23 16:10:57 +0200) are available in the git repository at:

[oe] [PATCH 1/2][meta-oe] swig: remove package

From: Wenzong Fan swig 3.0.6 has been moved to oe-croe: 66923c6776da13bd4513a73c3f7c5e60d74eb0f3 Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan --- meta-oe/recipes-devtools/swig/swig.inc | 63

Re: [oe] [Meta-qt5] Multiple definition of None on qminimaleglintegration for BBB

> On Oct 7, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Ahsan, Noor wrote: > > Hello, > > We were building QT5 on BBB and we faced similar issue which has been fixed > in >

Re: [oe] meta-openembedded "toolchain-layer" is broken

At this point, I would accept a patch to remove this layer from meta-openembedded no body maintains it anymore. > On Oct 7, 2015, at 12:30 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > > If you happen to have "toolchain-layer" in your bblayer list, it will trigger > this: > > ERROR:

[oe] [Meta-qt5] Multiple definition of None on qminimaleglintegration for BBB

Hello, We were building QT5 on BBB and we faced similar issue which has been fixed in 0012-qeglplatformscreen.cpp-reorder-headers-to-fix-build-.patch0012-qeglplatformscreen.cpp-reorder-headers-to-fix-build-.patch but this time it is on qminimaleglintegration file. Can anybody guide us how to

[oe] Multiple bbappends and their order

Hello, suppose I have layers A, B, and C. Layer A provides a recipe. I want to append this recipe in both layers B and C. In what order are the appends going to be applied? Is it deterministic? Does it depend on layer priority? Something else entirely? Thank you in advance Angelika --