Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 11:47 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > What's the advantage of more global .inc file? In OE-Core it started as a standalone experiment which made sense as a separate .inc as we've done with some other things of this nature. I thought it was going to take longer to work through

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-21 Thread Martin Jansa
What's the advantage of more global .inc file? IMHO it's only increasing chances for conflicts when merging/cherry-picking. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 20:43 +, Christopher Larson wrote: > > I think

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 20:43 +, Christopher Larson wrote: > I think the convention is to add such workarounds to no-static > -libs.inc, > not the recipe, at this time. This is a good question. I was just doing some world builds with meta -oe in and have a few more of these fixes. Referencing