Re: [oe] [meta-java] maintainer status

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi, On 06/12/2018 10:59 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Richard Leitner > mailto:richard.leit...@skidata.com>> wrote: > > Hi Maxin, Hi Henning, > > thank you for your answers! > > On 06/11/2018 02:08 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1

Re: [oe] [meta-python][PATCH] python-lockfile: Fix build error as following:

2018-06-12 Thread Lei, Maohui
Hi, This patch also applies to sumo, please merge to sumo. Best regards. Lei > -Original Message- > From: Lei, Maohui > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2018 5:43 AM > To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > Cc: Lei, Maohui > Subject: [oe] [meta-python][PATCH] python-lockfile: Fix build err

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] syslog-ng: update to 3.15.1

2018-06-12 Thread Khem Raj
Fails to build with qemux86_64/musl In file included from /mnt/a/oe/build/tmp/work/core2-64-bec-linux-musl/syslog-ng/3.15.1-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/include/limits.h:8, from /mnt/a/oe/build/tmp/work/core2-64-bec-linux-musl/syslog-ng/3.15.1-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include/g

Re: [oe] [meta-java] maintainer status

2018-06-12 Thread Michael Halstead
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Richard Leitner < richard.leit...@skidata.com> wrote: > Hi Maxin, Hi Henning, > > thank you for your answers! > > On 06/11/2018 02:08 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:30:35PM +0300, Maxin B. John wrote: > >>> > >>> So here are some questio

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCHv3] jdepend: Retrieve source from Git rather than tarball

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi, this is a note to let you know that I've just added this patch to the master-next branch of the meta-java repository at git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-java As soon as it has gone through some more testing it will likely be merged to the master branch. If you have any questions, pleas

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 0/4] README: update to reflect current status

2018-06-12 Thread Burton, Ross
The same happens for Richard Purdie for me, I suspect the problem is that you're sending mail from your own machine (or some other relay) but skidata.com has SPF configured and that machine isn't listed. Ross On 12 June 2018 at 15:51, wrote: > Hi Maxin, > > On 06/12/2018 04:38 PM, Maxin B. John

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] ne10: Use `cp -d ...` instead of `cp -a ...` to install a symbolic link

2018-06-12 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
Using `cp -a ...` to install the link will preserv the owner of the original link, which will be the user who ran the do_compile task, rather than root. Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt --- meta-oe/recipes-support/ne10/ne10_1.2.1.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --

Re: [oe] [PATCH][sumo][meta-oe 1/2] Revert "libxml++: only include when x11 in DISTRO_FEATURES"

2018-06-12 Thread akuster808
On 06/12/2018 11:12 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > This reverts commit 44ece3daea4028e72473b6316ba3c7c54d833166. > --- > meta-oe/recipes-core/libxml/libxml++_2.40.1.bb | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/libxml/libxml++_2.40.1.bb > b/meta-oe/

[oe] [PATCH][morty][meta-oe 1/2] python-matplotlib: Upgrade to 2.0.2

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
From: Khem Raj Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- .../python/python-matplotlib/fix_setup.patch | 29 .../python-matplotlib/fix_setupext.patch | 136 +- .../python/python-matplotlib_1.1.0.bb | 33 - .../python/python-matplotlib_2.0.2

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] libsodium: update to 1.0.16

2018-06-12 Thread Oleksandr Kravchuk
Added link to bug tracker and updated md5sum of LICENSE, which has been updated with the copyright year. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kravchuk --- .../recipes-crypto/libsodium/libsodium_1.0.11.bb| 12 .../recipes-crypto/libsodium/libsodium_1.0.16.bb| 13 + 2 files ch

[oe] [PATCH][morty][meta-oe 2/2] rarpd, sblim-sfcb, openct: inherit systemd unconditionally

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
* the inherit was controlled by VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager and the installation of .service files by DISTRO_FEATURES and systemd was in DISTRO_FEATURES but not in VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager it was causing QA issues about unpackaged .service files ERROR: rarpd-ss981107-r0 do_package: QA

[oe] [PATCH][pyro][meta-oe 1/3] fluentbit: backport one patch from 0.12.0 to fix aarch64 build

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
* rocko and newer already have a version newer than 0.12.0 so this change isn't needed there and 0.7.2 in morty doesn't need it as well. Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- .../fluentbit/fluentbit/aarch64.patch | 64 +++ .../fluentbit/fluentbit_0.11.3.bb | 3

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] mercurial: upgrade to 4.6.1

2018-06-12 Thread Oleksandr Kravchuk
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kravchuk --- .../mercurial/{mercurial_4.4.bb => mercurial_4.6.1.bb}| 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/mercurial/{mercurial_4.4.bb => mercurial_4.6.1.bb} (85%) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/mercurial

[oe] [PATCH][pyro][meta-oe 3/3] rarpd, sblim-sfcb, openct: inherit systemd unconditionally

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
* the inherit was controlled by VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager and the installation of .service files by DISTRO_FEATURES and systemd was in DISTRO_FEATURES but not in VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager it was causing QA issues about unpackaged .service files ERROR: rarpd-ss981107-r0 do_package: QA

[oe] [PATCH][pyro][meta-oe 2/3] python-matplotlib: Upgrade to 2.0.2

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
From: Khem Raj Signed-off-by: Khem Raj Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- .../python/python-matplotlib/fix_setup.patch | 29 .../python-matplotlib/fix_setupext.patch | 136 +- .../python/python-matplotlib_1.1.0.bb | 33 - .../python/python-matplotlib_2.0.2

[oe] [PATCH][rocko][meta-oe] rarpd, sblim-sfcb, openct: inherit systemd unconditionally

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
* the inherit was controlled by VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager and the installation of .service files by DISTRO_FEATURES and systemd was in DISTRO_FEATURES but not in VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager it was causing QA issues about unpackaged .service files ERROR: rarpd-ss981107-r0 do_package: QA

[oe] [PATCH][sumo][meta-oe 2/2] android-tools: use fixed SRCREVs instead of tag name

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
* so that bitbake doesn't need to use git ls-remote during parsing to resolve tag name into SRCREV Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- .../android-tools/android-tools_5.1.1.r37.bb | 18 -- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/andr

[oe] [PATCH][sumo][meta-oe 1/2] Revert "libxml++: only include when x11 in DISTRO_FEATURES"

2018-06-12 Thread Martin Jansa
This reverts commit 44ece3daea4028e72473b6316ba3c7c54d833166. --- meta-oe/recipes-core/libxml/libxml++_2.40.1.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/libxml/libxml++_2.40.1.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-core/libxml/libxml++_2.40.1.bb index a38315c4d5..c0

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libsodium: update to 1.0.16

2018-06-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 5:52 PM Oleksandr Kravchuk wrote: > > Added link to bug tracker and updated md5sum of LICENSE, which has been > updated with the copyright year. The patch seem to not reflect this. Secondly, It should have updated SRC_URI checksums too which seems missing as well. > > Sign

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] mercurial: upgrade to 4.6.1

2018-06-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 6:24 PM Oleksandr Kravchuk wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kravchuk > --- > .../mercurial/{mercurial_4.4.bb => mercurial_4.6.1.bb} | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/mercurial/{mercurial_4.4.bb => > me

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 0/4] README: update to reflect current status

2018-06-12 Thread Maxin B. John
Hi Richard, On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 04:51:49PM +0200, prvs=69472e970=richard.leit...@skidata.com wrote: > Hi Maxin, > > On 06/12/2018 04:38 PM, Maxin B. John wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 04:33:27PM +0200, > > openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org wrote: >

[oe] [PATCH] libgpiod: add packageconfig for C++ bindings

2018-06-12 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- meta-oe/recipes-support/libgpiod/libgpiod_1.1.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libgpiod/libgpiod_1.1.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libgpiod/libgpiod_1.1.bb index 1bda8bc3a..ab0bc980d 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipe

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 0/4] README: update to reflect current status

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi Maxin, On 06/12/2018 04:38 PM, Maxin B. John wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 04:33:27PM +0200, > openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org wrote: >> Update the README file to reflect current maintainers, dependencies and patch >> formatting/sending guidlines. >> >> Ma

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 0/4] README: update to reflect current status

2018-06-12 Thread Maxin B. John
Hi Richard, On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 04:33:27PM +0200, openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Update the README file to reflect current maintainers, dependencies and patch > formatting/sending guidlines. > > Mario Domenech Goulart (1): > README: Remove Mario Goulart from the

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 3/4] README: add maintainer: Richard Leitner

2018-06-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Richard Leitner wrote: > As discussed on the openembedded-devel ML [1] add myself as a maintainer > for this layer. > > [1] > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2018-June/118697.html > > Cc: Henning Heinold > Cc: Mario Domenech Goulart >

[oe] [meta-java][PATCH 4/4] README: Remove Mario Goulart from the list of maintainers

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
From: Mario Domenech Goulart Signed-off-by: Mario Domenech Goulart Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner --- README | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 2b63a11..b66df64 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ When sending patches, please use something l

[oe] [meta-java][PATCH 3/4] README: add maintainer: Richard Leitner

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
As discussed on the openembedded-devel ML [1] add myself as a maintainer for this layer. [1] http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2018-June/118697.html Cc: Henning Heinold Cc: Mario Domenech Goulart Cc: Maxin John Cc: Otavio Salvador Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner ---

[oe] [meta-java][PATCH 2/4] README: add note on how to send a patch series with cover-letter

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
As patch series should include a cover letter describing the whole series shortly add a note on this in the README. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner --- README | 11 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 564a924..905c311 100644 --- a/README

[oe] [meta-java][PATCH 1/4] README: fix dependent branch names

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
As we currently depend on the master branches of meta-oe and oe-core adapt the README accordingly. Furthermore add a short note on our stable branches. Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner --- README | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 3351

[oe] [meta-java][PATCH 0/4] README: update to reflect current status

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Update the README file to reflect current maintainers, dependencies and patch formatting/sending guidlines. Mario Domenech Goulart (1): README: Remove Mario Goulart from the list of maintainers Richard Leitner (3): README: fix dependent branch names README: add note on how to send a patch s

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 1/2] openjdk-8: remove debuglink

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
On 06/12/2018 02:02 PM, Wenlin Kang wrote: > On 2018年06月12日 19:35, Wenlin Kang wrote: >> On 2018年06月12日 19:09, Richard Leitner wrote: >>> Hi Wenlin, >>> >>> On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: We need remove previous debuglink before add it if it has existed, because it may have a

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 1/2] openjdk-8: remove debuglink

2018-06-12 Thread Wenlin Kang
On 2018年06月12日 19:35, Wenlin Kang wrote: On 2018年06月12日 19:09, Richard Leitner wrote: Hi Wenlin, On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: We need remove previous debuglink before add it if it has existed, because it may have a different file name with this that we will add. I'm sorry but I

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 1/2] openjdk-8: remove debuglink

2018-06-12 Thread Wenlin Kang
On 2018年06月12日 19:09, Richard Leitner wrote: Hi Wenlin, On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: We need remove previous debuglink before add it if it has existed, because it may have a different file name with this that we will add. I'm sorry but I don't get the reason why we need this... I

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 2/2] openjdk-8: combine the -dbg package

2018-06-12 Thread Wenlin Kang
On 2018年06月12日 19:09, Richard Leitner wrote: On 06/12/2018 12:59 PM, Wenlin Kang wrote: On 2018年06月12日 16:01, Richard Leitner wrote: Hi Richard Hi Wenlin, as we clarified the "one -dbg package per recipe" thing I have some comments on the patch itself. On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wr

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 2/2] openjdk-8: combine the -dbg package

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
On 06/12/2018 12:59 PM, Wenlin Kang wrote: > On 2018年06月12日 16:01, Richard Leitner wrote: > > Hi Richard > >> Hi Wenlin, >> as we clarified the "one -dbg package per recipe" thing I have some >> comments on the patch itself. >> >> >> On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: >>> One recipe shou

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 1/2] openjdk-8: remove debuglink

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi Wenlin, On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: > We need remove previous debuglink before add it if it has existed, > because it may have a different file name with this that we will add. I'm sorry but I don't get the reason why we need this... It would be great if you may please explain i

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 2/2] openjdk-8: combine the -dbg package

2018-06-12 Thread Wenlin Kang
On 2018年06月12日 16:01, Richard Leitner wrote: Hi Richard Hi Wenlin, as we clarified the "one -dbg package per recipe" thing I have some comments on the patch itself. On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks up all .debug fi

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH v2] syslog-ng: update to 3.15.1

2018-06-12 Thread Andrej Valek
- Refresh and remove obsolete patches - Implement SystemD service files handling - splitted service into default - Remove dependency to eventlog - external libevtlog library linking was removed - Version 3.15.1 supports OpenSSL 1.1 Signed-off-by: Andrej Valek --- ...ry-leak-problem-when-

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCHv3] jdepend: Retrieve source from Git rather than tarball

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi, although the old checksum matches with the current github archive for me please feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Richard Leitner and Tested-by: Richard Leitner regards;Richard.L On 05/08/2018 11:36 AM, Mike Crowe wrote: > When Bitbake downloads jdepend-2.9.1.zip itself and I download > https

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 2/2] openjdk-8: combine the -dbg package

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi Wenlin, as we clarified the "one -dbg package per recipe" thing I have some comments on the patch itself. On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: > One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks > up all .debug file into the last one -dbg package listed in variable > PA

Re: [oe] [meta-java][PATCH 2/2] openjdk-8: combine the -dbg package

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi, On 06/11/2018 08:31 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On 06/08/2018 06:07 PM, Richard Leitner wrote: >> On 06/08/2018 11:02 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote: >>> On 2018年06月08日 15:39, Richard Leitner wrote: ... Nonehteless according to my first quick test the demo-dbg package con

Re: [oe] [meta-java] maintainer status

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Leitner
Hi Maxin, Hi Henning, thank you for your answers! On 06/11/2018 02:08 PM, Henning Heinold wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:30:35PM +0300, Maxin B. John wrote: >>> >>> So here are some question that currently came to my mind: >>> >>> * do you use some kind of patch management software (like pa