Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] tcpdump: fix CVE-2017-11541, 11542, 11543

2017-09-13 Thread Jose Lamego
; >>> ++ } >>> + if (ndo->ndo_nflag) { >>> + /* XXX just dump the header */ >>> + register int i; >>> +@@ -155,13 +168,21 @@ sliplink_print(netdissect_options *ndo, >>> +* has restored the IP header copy to IPPROTO_TCP. >>> +*/ >>> + lastconn = ((const struct ip *)[SLX_CHDR])->ip_p; >>> ++ ND_PRINT((ndo, "utcp %d: ", lastconn)); >>> ++ if (dir == -1) { >>> ++ /* Direction is bogus, don't use it */ >>> ++ return; >>> ++ } >>> + hlen = IP_HL(ip); >>> + hlen += TH_OFF((const struct tcphdr *)&((const int >>> *)ip)[hlen]); >>> + lastlen[dir][lastconn] = length - (hlen << 2); >>> +- ND_PRINT((ndo, "utcp %d: ", lastconn)); >>> + break; >>> + >>> + default: >>> ++ if (dir == -1) { >>> ++ /* Direction is bogus, don't use it */ >>> ++ return; >>> ++ } >>> + if (p[SLX_CHDR] & TYPE_COMPRESSED_TCP) { >>> + compressed_sl_print(ndo, [SLX_CHDR], ip, >>> + length, dir); >>> + >>> +-- >>> +2.13.0 >>> + >>> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/tcpdump/tcpdump_4.9.1.bb >>> b/meta-networking/recipes-support/tcpdump/tcpdump_4.9.1.bb >>> index 261c78427..668d6f5e1 100644 >>> --- a/meta-networking/recipes-support/tcpdump/tcpdump_4.9.1.bb >>> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/tcpdump/tcpdump_4.9.1.bb >>> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ SRC_URI = " \ >>> file://tcpdump-configure-dlpi.patch \ >>> file://add-ptest.patch \ >>> file://run-ptest \ >>> +file://0001-CVE-2017-11542-PIMv1-Add-a-bounds-check.patch \ >>> +file://0001-CVE-2017-11541-In-safeputs-check-the-length-before-c.patch >>> \ >>> +file://0001-CVE-2017-11543-Make-sure-the-SLIP-direction-octet-is.patch >>> \ >>> " >>> SRC_URI[md5sum] = "1e0293210b0dea5ef18e88e4150394b7" >>> >>> -- >> ___ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> -- Jose Lamego | OTC Embedded Platform & Tools | GDC -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][V2 patch] rrdtool: allow configuration to disable nls

2017-06-05 Thread Jose Lamego
ve" >>>> SYSTEMD_PACKAGES = "rrdcached" >>>> SYSTEMD_SERVICE_rrdcached = "rrdcached.socket rrdcached.service" >>>> -EXTRA_AUTORECONF = "-I m4" >>>> +EXTRA_AUTORECONF = "-I m4 --exclude=autopoint&quo

Re: [oe] [OE-core] Patchwork not picking changes from the ML Was: [meta-python][PATCH] python-paho-mqtt: update to version 1.2

2017-02-22 Thread Jose Lamego
embedded-devel mailing list > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > <mailto:Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] Patchwork-Status via email

2017-02-07 Thread Jose Lamego
On 02/07/2017 01:10 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 12:32 -0600, Jose Lamego wrote: >> >> On 02/07/2017 04:59 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: >>> What about this use case here: the original author wants to retract a >>> patch. Can he do that v

Re: [oe] Patchwork-Status via email

2017-02-07 Thread Jose Lamego
Can he do that via email and/or the web interface? > Patch submitter (and project maintainers) can update status manually through the web interface. > I wasn't the original author and probably also no project maintainer, so > I guess that's why my email had n

Re: [oe] meta-openembedded patchwork git hook

2016-12-14 Thread Jose Lamego
On 12/14/2016 02:27 PM, Jose Lamego wrote: > > > On 12/02/2016 09:45 AM, Jose Lamego wrote: >> I'm looking into this right now. I've filed a bug for tracking: >> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10759 >> >> >> On 12/02/2016 06:29 AM, T

Re: [oe] meta-openembedded patchwork git hook

2016-12-14 Thread Jose Lamego
On 12/02/2016 09:45 AM, Jose Lamego wrote: > I'm looking into this right now. I've filed a bug for tracking: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10759 > > > On 12/02/2016 06:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:30:09AM +0100, Martin Jansa w

Re: [oe] meta-openembedded patchwork git hook

2016-12-02 Thread Jose Lamego
I'm looking into this right now. I've filed a bug for tracking: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10759 On 12/02/2016 06:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:30:09AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:41:20PM -0600, Jose Lam

Re: [oe] meta-openembedded patchwork git hook

2016-11-30 Thread Jose Lamego
On 11/29/2016 07:50 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Jose Lamego <jose.a.lam...@linux.intel.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/29/2016 02:43 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:52:46AM +1300, Paul Eg

Re: [oe] meta-openembedded patchwork git hook

2016-11-29 Thread Jose Lamego
uses bundles and > tracks what ends up being committed this may or may not be a problem. > And I'm sure upstream patchwork would appreciate any changes to improve > hashing success :) > Regards Jose -- Jose Lamego | OTC Embedded Platforms & Tools | GDC signature.asc Description: