On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:01:09AM +, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> Hello Mikko,
>
> On 11/18/19 10:13 AM, mikko.rap...@bmw.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 04:12:56PM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> Hi Jeroen
> >>
> >> On Monday, 18 November 2019 10:44:37 AM NZDT Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> >>>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 04:12:56PM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Jeroen
>
> On Monday, 18 November 2019 10:44:37 AM NZDT Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> > Gcc 9.2 miscompiles the foreach resulting in broken applications.
> > This backports a fix from qt5 to make it work again. The fix is
> > not
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 07:48:34AM -0800, akuster808 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Reading through the 2019 OEDeM minutes, I saw a statement regarding a
> more regular update frequency on the stable branches. Based on Richard's
> response I could not tell if it is regarding merge frequency to
> mainline
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:17:10PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Nevermind, now I see that your changes is based on top of mine.
>
> Will re-test with your change - strange that I wasn't seeing it here, I do
> have security-flags as well as ptest enabled as well.
Yes, my change is on top of
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:51:18PM -0700, Robert Joslyn wrote:
> When building cryptsetup-native, don't enable udev support since there
> is not a udev-native recipe.
>
> When udev is enabled, change the dependency from a DEPENDS to an
> RDEPENDS. The --enable-udev option adds a runtime check for
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 11:53:05PM +, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Joslyn
> > Sent: den 28 juni 2019 05:51
> > To: Peter Kjellerstedt ; akuster808
> > ; openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] cryptsetup:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:23:49AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 5:37 AM Aditya Tayade wrote:
> >
> > Description:
> > As alioth (the Debian service hosting anonscm) has been discontinued using
> > https://alioth-archive.debian.org/git/ltrace/ltrace.git.tar.xz as a new
> >
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:03:01AM +0900, Changhyeok Bae wrote:
> Hi maintainers
>
> Qt 5.6 is LTS version and not GPL3 license.
> So why don't you keep v5.6.x in master branch?
> Many companies, opensource projects and developers would like to use Qt
> v5.6 in master branch to use it with latest
Yes, we have been affected by this several times too.
In addition to fixing recipes, a sanity test to warn about the situation
would be nice to have so that the issue could be detected in other
meta layers too.
-Mikko
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:36:36PM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> Mikko,
>
> wrong ML. I think you want openembedded-c...@lists.openembedded.org
Yep, resent to oe-core yesterday:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-September/141739.html
-Mikko
--
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:19:09AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:53:24AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > All packages using this class need it and it is too easy for developers
> > to miss and leave race conditions into builds.
> >
> > Change-Id:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:26:27AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> All packages using this class need it and it is too easy for developers
> to miss and leave race conditions into builds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli
> ---
> classes/cmake_qt5.bbclass | 2 ++
> 1 file
12 matches
Mail list logo