[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] htop: delete not used patch

2015-11-27 Thread Radek Dostal
remove-proc-test.patch was not used since commit 78909f65d8 "htop: upgrade to version 1.0.2" Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal <radek.dos...@streamunlimited.com> --- meta-oe/recipes-support/htop/htop/remove-proc-test.patch | 13 - 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) delete mod

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] gitver: fix gitver to work with yocto 1.3

2012-10-29 Thread Radek Dostal
replace oe_run and oe.process with bb.process gitver got broken by following oe-core commits: 15ad62ab1be060d8a7cdc2d28167ea3af4cfd5d5 d56062cbf92ef206bf06c767befacb66927a9a36 Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com --- meta-oe/classes/gitver.bbclass | 21 - 1

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libopus: add libopus_0.9.14

2012-06-14 Thread Radek Dostal
Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com --- meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus-fpu.inc |6 ++ .../recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus_0.9.14.bb | 20 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-multimedia

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libopus: add libopus_0.9.10

2012-05-24 Thread Radek Dostal
Koen, any more comments to updated version? Thanks, Radek On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com ---  meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus-fpu.inc |    6 ++  .../recipes-multimedia/libopus

[oe] [PATCH] ntpd-systemd: ntpd is started with -g parameter

2012-05-24 Thread Radek Dostal
needed for correct functionality in systems without battery backed RTC Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com --- meta-oe/recipes-support/ntp/files/ntpd.service |2 +- meta-oe/recipes-support/ntp/ntp_4.2.6p3.bb |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

Re: [oe] [PATCH] ntpd-systemd: ntpd is started with -g parameter

2012-05-24 Thread Radek Dostal
Please ignore this patch, now I understand how ntp works togehter with ntpdate. Thanks, Radek On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com wrote: needed for correct functionality in systems without battery backed RTC Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libopus: add libopus_0.9.10

2012-05-15 Thread Radek Dostal
Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com --- meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus-fpu.inc |6 ++ .../recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus_0.9.10.bb | 20 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-multimedia

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libopus: adding libopus_0.9.10

2012-05-10 Thread Radek Dostal
Signed-off-by: Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com --- .../recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus_0.9.10.bb | 22 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libopus/libopus_0.9.10.bb diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia

Re: [oe] Simultaneous build of two intree packages

2012-05-09 Thread Radek Dostal
Fixing the packages, is probably the way to go. You could also create pseudo package D which is available in several versions. Package D-1.0c:      Package D is depending on nothing Package D-1.0bc:    Package D is depending on B Package C is always dependent on Package D and A. Package B

[oe] Simultaneous build of two intree packages

2012-05-07 Thread Radek Dostal
Dear All, I have three intree recipes A, B and C which are part of the same layer. = B depends on A = C depends on A. There is no dependency between B and C. Only important thing is that B and C are not build simultaneously. This is not a problem unless I use configure BB_NUMBER_THREADS 1. Than

Re: [oe] Simultaneous build of two intree packages

2012-05-07 Thread Radek Dostal
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 06:02 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2012-05-07 05:54, Radek Dostal wrote: Dear All, I have three intree recipes A, B and C which are part of the same layer. = B depends on A = C depends on A. There is no dependency between B and C. Only important thing

Re: [oe] Simultaneous build of two intree packages

2012-05-07 Thread Radek Dostal
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:46 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: usually it crashes during ln -sf target dest which is executed simultaneously with same parameters for both builds. There are other issues as well in addition to this ln issue. This is confusing why does this happen at all Because ln

Re: [oe] Simultaneous build of two intree packages

2012-05-07 Thread Radek Dostal
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 15:08 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: I think that your recipes are not well behaved - two recipes probably should not be creating the same file in such a way. Can you post the recipes, or at least the code snippets that break? I agree usually it should not be a case, but