Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM Martin Jansa wrote: > FYI: You can use PV = "2.0.99+2.1.0-beta3" to make sure that it's sorted > higher than any 2.0.* release and that final 2.1.0 again sorts higher than > this beta3 without PE bump. > There are some packages which

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-10-31

On 11/01/2017 08:30 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Martin/Armin > > I looked at the first report with musl from Martin. Most of the > failures are familiar except 2 I think which I plan to look at. I > haven't blacklisted them intentionally, to get annoyed enough to keep > fixing them as time permits.

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

FYI: You can use PV = "2.0.99+2.1.0-beta3" to make sure that it's sorted higher than any 2.0.* release and that final 2.1.0 again sorts higher than this beta3 without PE bump. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:23 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 11/08/2017 11:05 AM, Martin Jansa

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

On 11/08/2017 11:05 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > The only change from previous report is slightly newer oe-core and bitbake. > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='4'|Failed tasks

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> The only change from previous report is slightly newer oe-core and bitbake. >> >> >> http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > The only change from previous report is slightly newer oe-core and bitbake. > > > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-10-31

Hi Martin/Armin I looked at the first report with musl from Martin. Most of the failures are familiar except 2 I think which I plan to look at. I haven't blacklisted them intentionally, to get annoyed enough to keep fixing them as time permits. infact none of the build failures are due to musl

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-10-31

Hi Armin, I'll leave this question to Khem, this was my just 2nd build with musl, Khem is doing musl builds for very long time and fixing all the issue he finds, maybe some of the issues detected in world builds already have fixes in Khem's queue. Regards, On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:53 AM,

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-10-31

Martin, On 10/31/2017 01:58 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > With 2 pending patches from Khem to build systemd with musl: > 62c7c98 systemd: Fix build on musl > de68252 systemd: Fix build with musl/mips64 > the qemux86+musl build was able to progress much further and fewer ERROR > messages were shown.

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-14

Done https://github.com/shr-project/jenkins-jobs/commit/dbb5e4e4e2c5821381eda729ab746a21238c8801 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Martin Jansa > wrote: > > Just the commit IDs from the top won't be

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-14

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Just the commit IDs from the top won't be very useful, because it's from > jansa/master branches which are rebased even more often than master-next. > > If you really want to see them, then there are links to the build

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-14

Just the commit IDs from the top won't be very useful, because it's from jansa/master branches which are rebased even more often than master-next. If you really want to see them, then there are links to the build logs for each MACHINE and you can see the build configuration there. That's why at

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-14

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Probably is, qemux86 was built from slightly older metadata, so probably > including previous versions of your klibc changes. > > I know it's confusing in the report, but still each build takes around 24 > hours per

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-14

Probably is, qemux86 was built from slightly older metadata, so probably including previous versions of your klibc changes. I know it's confusing in the report, but still each build takes around 24 hours per machine and I have only 2 builders. e.g. this qemux86 build was started 20170912_234104

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-14

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks !!|Signatures !!colspan='14'|QA > !!Comment > |- > ||

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-01

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks!!|Signatures > !!colspan='14'|QA !!Comment > |- > || ||qemuarm

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-08-24

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Issues in meta-qt5 caused by security_flags.inc were fixed in this round, for > next round I'll test fixed 5.9.0 upgrade and then final 5.9.2 upgrade. > > > Thanks for fixes for QA issues, few more are included in

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-08-11

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks > !!|Signatures

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-08-09

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 07:58:36PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > firefox and mariadb fail like this only since > > conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc was included > > > > qtbase fails because of ptest

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-08-09

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > firefox and mariadb fail like this only since > conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc was included > > qtbase fails because of ptest addition as reported on ML > >> Kodi patch to use std::string was sent. mongodb

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-07-16

I don't know what setup you're using, but my is described here: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status_Setup and the current version published with the results: http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/rocko/log.world.qemuarm.20170717_011149.log/world_fixes.inc now I see

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-07-16

firefox and ipppool seems to not fail for me here. so I wonder what might be different. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > The v2s of those patches really helped: > > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues -

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-07-13

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > OK, I'll merge current batch of pending changes and before next build I'll > include > conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc > > Is that all I need to do? > yep > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Khem Raj

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-07-13

OK, I'll merge current batch of pending changes and before next build I'll include conf/distro/include/security_flags.inc Is that all I need to do? On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Martin > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Martin Jansa

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-07-13

Hi Martin On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > The results looks good. I wanted to suggest to start building with hardening flags on if possible. I have ensured that there are no regressions with

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-07-02

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks!!|Signatures > !!colspan='14'|QA !!Comment > |- > || ||qemuarm

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-06-18

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Firefox and chromium-* fixed few more to go, but not bad for big gcc > upgrade. > > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-04-04

I will look into netmap, lksctp-tools, bundler., php5/7 - armin On 04/05/2017 02:23 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: == Number of issues - stats == {| class='wikitable' !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks !!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-04-01

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:57:01PM +0200, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> qemux86 shows more failures, I've dropped few master-next changes > >> after this

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-04-01

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:17:49PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> qemux86 shows more failures, I've dropped few master-next changes >> after this build. > > I've noticed that the report doesn't cover all currently

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27

On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 12:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld? > > > > yes, see example in: > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc > > meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind_git.bb Thanks. I'll try to do something similar. > but it

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27

> Can individual recipes choose to be built using the normal ld? yes, see example in: meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc meta/recipes-support/libunwind/libunwind_git.bb but it was working with older binutils, so maybe worth tracking down where it got borken. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:38 AM,

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27

On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 11:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:35:23AM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at > > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:35:23AM +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at > > http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/pyro/log.report.20170328_014155.log > > That used OE-core 552bd78,

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-27

On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 09:23 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > INFO: jenkins-job.sh-1.8.19 Complete log available at > http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/oe/world/pyro/log.report.20170328_014155.log That used OE-core 552bd78, if I read this right: == Tested changes (not included in master

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-11

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Mark Asselstine > wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> This time the results are very

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-11

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Mark Asselstine wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> This time the results are very inconsistent across different MACHINEs >> because they were using significantly different

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-01

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Util-linux is the preferred provider for libuuid (it moved from e2fsprogs to > util-linux a few years ago). > > regards, > Thanks - did not know that (just asked oe-layer-list). Will try that one next weekend...

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-03-01

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > * > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-extended/parted/parted_3.2.bb:do_compile_ptest_base Before Martin blacklists gparted for dependency :) 1. Autobuilder error log says: |

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-02-23

Yes, it is reproduced only when ld-is-gold and ptest are used in DISTRO_FEATURES. On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 23 February 2017 at 22:20, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> === common (2) === >> *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-02-23

On 23 February 2017 at 22:20, Martin Jansa wrote: > === common (2) === > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-extended/parted/parted_3.2.bb: > do_compile_ptest_base > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-support/apr/apr_1.5.2. > bb:do_compile_ptest_base > FWIW neither me

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-02-22

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > 2nd build today just to confirm fix for chromium-wayland on qemux86, > pidgin and geoclue. > >> I've dropped only the last unblacklist for mpd which is still failing, >> will try it now with unblacklist, but without

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-02-08

Yup, that patch was already in my oe-core fork for next run. see http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2017-February/73.html On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 10 February 2017 at 08:28, Martin Jansa

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-02-08

On 10 February 2017 at 08:28, Martin Jansa wrote: > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-support/libxslt/libxslt_1.1.29.bb: > do_compile > This is due to ld-is-gold, there's a patch from Jussi on the list (and in mut). Ross --

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-02-08

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:28:11AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> == Number of issues - stats == >> {| class='wikitable' >> !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks >>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-01-31

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 08:08:20PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 31 January 2017 at 17:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > There is a lot more failures this time (mostly because of RSS), but > > I wanted to share it anyway, to be clear about the current state of > > other

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-01-31

On 31 January 2017 at 17:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-connectivity/wpa- > supplicant/wpa-supplicant_2.6.bb:do_compile > * openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.16.bb:do_configure > *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-01-31

On 31 January 2017 at 17:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > There is a lot more failures this time (mostly because of RSS), but > I wanted to share it anyway, to be clear about the current state of > other layers. > I presume you'll be changing this script as the minimal/maximal

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-12-06

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks > !!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies!!|Signatures >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-11-03

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:32:27PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Please note that the logs aren't available online, because the server with > > logs > > was moved to other HW and the files weren't rsynced (yet - at

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-11-03

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Please note that the logs aren't available online, because the server with > logs > was moved to other HW and the files weren't rsynced (yet - at least not to > correct > location visible as

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-10-04

> === qemuarm (1) === > * > meta-openembedded/meta-filesystems/recipes-support/physfs/physfs_git.bb:do_populate_lic ^ This one was fixed during run - correct? > > === qemux86 (2) === > * > meta-browser/recipes-browser/chromium/chromium_52.0.2743.76.bb:do_compile > * >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-09-20

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> == Number of issues - stats == >> {| class='wikitable' >> !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks >>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-09-20

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks > !!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies!!|Signatures >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-09-15

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> == Number of issues - stats == >> {| class='wikitable' >> !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks >>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-09-15

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks > !!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies!!|Signatures >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-08-24

I performed a verbose build on my build machine to see how it compares to yours. On Wed 2016-08-31 @ 05:41:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Fri 2016-08-26 @ 05:51:54 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > | [2278/20239] CXX obj.host/third_party/icu/source/common/icuuc.servrbf.o > | FAILED:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-08-24

On Fri 2016-08-26 @ 05:51:54 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > === common-x86 (1) === > * > meta-browser/recipes-browser/chromium/chromium-wayland_48.0.2548.0.bb:do_patch It was pointed out to me that while re-organizing the chromium recipes I dropped an important line in chromium-wayland. However

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-06-13

Derek already sent similar patches. Thanks On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 12:45 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > libgphoto2, v4l-utils fail because recent upgrade of libjpeg-turbo in > oe-core (PNBLACKLIST sent) > > I have

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-06-07

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > This report includes python3 changes, there are few more failures, but > it's hard to see what is new, so I've sent couple PNBLACKLISTs for > recipes reported in previous 2 reports which are still failing with >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world 2016-05-12

On 05/13/2016 01:31 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > This time complete QA issues list > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks > !!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies!!|Signatures

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-16

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:23:11 Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Thu 2016-03-17 @ 03:43:57 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > c278358 metadata-revs: provide more information > > I think the general consensus was to not accept patch c278358 since it > affected the layout of a file that was expected to be

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-16

On Thu 2016-03-17 @ 03:43:57 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > c278358 metadata-revs: provide more information I think the general consensus was to not accept patch c278358 since it affected the layout of a file that was expected to be processed by scripts. > e2bf30c buildhistory.bbclass: metadata-revs

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-12

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Blacklisting linux-yocto-tiny and linux-yocto-tiny-kexecboot helped > with random failures in qemux86* builds > > == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - bitbake == > 0eacf83 world-image: add extra target > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-09

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:52:14AM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Mark Hatle > > wrote: > > > > > On 3/10/16 5:53 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-09

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:52:14AM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Mark Hatle > wrote: > > > On 3/10/16 5:53 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > Aggressive PNBLACKLISTing continues. But linux-yocto (and modules > > depending on it) > > > are

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-09

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 3/10/16 5:53 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Aggressive PNBLACKLISTing continues. But linux-yocto (and modules > depending on it) > > are still broken :/. > > > > I'll look at cef3 and chromium issue, my recent patch

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-09

On 3/10/16 5:53 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Aggressive PNBLACKLISTing continues. But linux-yocto (and modules depending > on it) > are still broken :/. > > I'll look at cef3 and chromium issue, my recent patch for meta-browser > fixed the build for armv7a MACHINEs, so it probably needs to be

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-09

On 03/10/16 06:53, Martin Jansa wrote: I'll look at cef3 and chromium issue, my recent patch for meta-browser fixed the build for armv7a MACHINEs, so it probably needs to be extended a bit to cover warnings in x86 and then duplicate the same to cef3. This issue is there for so long, slowing down

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-02-26

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - bitbake == > 88fded1 world-image: add extra target > > == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - openembedded-core == > d5d0890 ffmpeg: update to 3.0 > 4e91977

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-25

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:31:53PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 27 January 2016 at 14:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > * /openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/cryptodev/ > > cryptodev-module_1.8.bb, do_make_scripts > > *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-25

On 27 January 2016 at 14:10, Martin Jansa wrote: > * /openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/cryptodev/ > cryptodev-module_1.8.bb, do_make_scripts > * /openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-modules_git.bb, > do_make_scripts > I can't replicate these

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-25

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:31:53PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 27 January 2016 at 14:10, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> > * /openembedded-core/meta/recipes-kernel/cryptodev/ >> >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-09, full QA report

On 16-01-15 03:13 AM, Andrea Adami wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: qemuarm was using slightly older metadata, that's why it shows more failures. Reexecuting qemuarm build shows only one failure: Summary: 1 task failed:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-09, full QA report

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 16-01-15 03:13 AM, Andrea Adami wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Martin Jansa >> wrote: >>> >>> qemuarm was using slightly older metadata, that's why it shows more >>>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-09, full QA report

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > qemuarm was using slightly older metadata, that's why it shows more failures. > > Reexecuting qemuarm build shows only one failure: > Summary: 1 task failed: > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-01

On 01/02/16 13:19, Martin Jansa wrote: > > == Tested changes (not included in master yet) - meta-openembedded == ... > 7020a19 nodejs: cleanup and update ... > > == Failed tasks 2016-01-01 == ... > > === qemuarm (1) === > * /meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_4.2.2.bb >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-12-17

On 12/18/15 06:25, Martin Jansa wrote: > === qemuarm (1) === > * /meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_4.2.2.bb, > do_compile I'm having a look at this one. -- ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, test-dependencies 2015-11-12

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:57:39AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:43:11PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > Another incremental test, only 26 recipes were tested, but it found enough >> >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, test-dependencies 2015-11-12

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:12:09PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 12 November 2015 at 11:43, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > WARN: clutter-gst-3.0: clutter-gst-3.0 rdepends on libgudev, but it isn't > > a build dependency? > > WARN: gammu: gammu rdepends on libgudev, but it

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, test-dependencies 2015-11-12

On 12 November 2015 at 11:43, Martin Jansa wrote: > WARN: clutter-gst-3.0: clutter-gst-3.0 rdepends on libgudev, but it isn't > a build dependency? > WARN: gammu: gammu rdepends on libgudev, but it isn't a build dependency? > WARN: gstreamer1.0-plugins-good:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-10-26

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:01:53PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:49:18PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Martin Jansa > > wrote: > > > > > === common (2) === > > > *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-10-26

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:49:18PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > === common (2) === > > * /meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/gerbil/gerbil_git.bb, > > do_compile > > *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-10-26

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > === common (2) === > * /meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/gerbil/gerbil_git.bb, > do_compile > * /openembedded-core/meta/recipes-graphics/libsdl2/libsdl2_2.0.3.bb, > do_compile ^ Hope I find time

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-10-02

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:40:39PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 3 October 2015 at 14:33, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> > *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-10-02

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:40:39PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 3 October 2015 at 14:33, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > * /openembedded-core/meta/recipes-gnome/libsecret/libsecret_0.18.2.bb, > > do_compile > > > > This fails with a giant number of assembler warnings,

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-10-02

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:40:39PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 3 October 2015 at 14:33, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > * /openembedded-core/meta/recipes-gnome/libsecret/libsecret_0.18.2.bb, > > do_compile > > > > This fails with a giant number of assembler warnings,

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-09-13

On 09/18/2015 04:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:56:04PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Time for even more PNBLACKLISTs.. > > And it got even worse. > > This run was built without sstate, so QA issues should be more complete. > I need to update the report script to show

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > ERROR: polkit-group-rule-datetime different signature for task >> >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:20AM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Martin Jansa > >> wrote:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:20AM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: >> >>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:14:59PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:20AM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Martin Jansa > >> wrote:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > ERROR: polkit-group-rule-datetime different signature for task > do_configure.sigdata between qemux86copy and qemuarm > runtaskdeps changed from ['polkitpolkit-group-rule-datetime.bb.do_patch', >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, wrong PACKAGE_ARCHs 2015-09-08

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > ERROR: polkit-group-rule-datetime different signature for task > > do_configure.sigdata between qemux86copy and qemuarm > > runtaskdeps changed from

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-08-30

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:16:22PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 14:56 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > OE @ ~/openembedded-core $ git log --oneline > > origin/master..contrib/jansa/master > > e223862 initramfs-framework: Drop allarch > > d51627d linux-firmware: Drop allarch

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-08-30

On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 14:56 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > OE @ ~/openembedded-core $ git log --oneline > origin/master..contrib/jansa/master > e223862 initramfs-framework: Drop allarch > d51627d linux-firmware: Drop allarch > ee54e69 ppp-dialin: Drop allarch > 2ff92fc usbinit, weston-init,

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-08-30

On 08/31/2015 04:32 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: * /meta-openembedded/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/epiphany/epiphany_2.30.6.bb, do_fetch This recipe will be removed when the new epiphany shows up in oe-core. *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-07-29

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: === common (12) === * /meta-openembedded/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/epdf_svn.bb, do_compile * /meta-openembedded/meta-filesystems/recipes-filesystems/smbnetfs/smbnetfs_git.bb, do_configure *

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-07-29

Hi Andreas Am Samstag, den 01.08.2015, 14:47 +0200 schrieb Andreas Müller: * /meta-openembedded/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gvfs/gvfs_1.10.1.bb, do_compile ^ Had a short look into this: It is caused by update of libgphoto2. Hope to find time this weekend. I did the same and have a

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2015-07-29

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: I have tried to move failing meta-oe pending patches to contrib/jansa/master-next-unresolved-review but there is still too many issues, if nobody steps-up to fix some of them I'll add more PNBLACKLISTs next week.

  1   2   3   >