On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>>
>>
>> Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon ha scritto:
>>
>> >On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:> I would like to add my
>> >support to Thomas' positi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>
>
> Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon ha scritto:
>
> >On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:> I would like to add my
> >support to Thomas' position.
> > > Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active
Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli wrote,
> To speak my mind, I think uClibc has no future in the next 2 or 3
> years, musl is a much more active project, with multiple embedded
> projects starting to use it, on the other end, (e)glibc has remedied
> its own problems and its useful again.
I am on your
Hi Florian,
Florian Fainelli wrote,
> Hello,
>
> (adding uclibc and Bernhard)
>
> 2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb :
> > Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,
> >
> > it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
> > The current maintainer does not response on any public or priv
