The x86 assembler optimisations contains text relocations and there
are no upstream plans to fix them:

  http://sourceforge.net/p/mpg123/bugs/168/

Benchmarking suggests that the SSE assembler is still clearly faster
than the generic C code, so leave the assembler optimisations enabled.

Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com>
---
 meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/mpg123_1.22.4.bb | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/mpg123_1.22.4.bb 
b/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/mpg123_1.22.4.bb
index 22ea572..d11a312 100644
--- a/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/mpg123_1.22.4.bb
+++ b/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/mpg123/mpg123_1.22.4.bb
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = " \
     ${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'altivec', '--with-cpu=altivec', '', 
d)} \
 "
 
+# The x86 assembler optimisations contains text relocations and there are no
+# upstream plans to fix them: http://sourceforge.net/p/mpg123/bugs/168/
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN}_append_x86 = " textrel"
+
 # Fails to build with thumb-1 (qemuarm)
 #| {standard input}: Assembler messages:
 #| {standard input}:47: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode 
`smull r5,r6,r7,r4'
-- 
1.9.1

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to