On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:04 PM Brendan Kerrigan wrote:
>
> Sounds good, I hadn't seen that. Should the existing lcms recipe be renamed
> to lcms2? Most distros seem to package it as such and it'd also simplify the
> recipe a bit (the PN would align with the tarball and source directory name).
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:04 AM Brendan Kerrigan wrote:
>
> Sounds good, I hadn't seen that. Should the existing lcms recipe be renamed
> to lcms2? Most distros seem to package it as such and it'd also simplify
> the recipe a bit (the PN would align with the tarball and source directory
> name).
>
Sounds good, I hadn't seen that. Should the existing lcms recipe be renamed
to lcms2? Most distros seem to package it as such and it'd also simplify
the recipe a bit (the PN would align with the tarball and source directory
name).
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:23 AM Burton, Ross wrote:
> On Mon, 29
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 16:42, brendank310 wrote:
> +inherit autotools pkgconfig distro_features_check
distro_features_check isn't being used.
But mainly, just update the existing recipe.
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:42 AM brendank310 wrote:
> From: Brendan Kerrigan
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Kerrigan
> ---
> meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome3/lcms2_2.9.bb | 14 ++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome3/lcms2_2.9.bb
>
> di
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:41 PM brendank310 wrote:
>
> From: Brendan Kerrigan
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Kerrigan
> ---
> meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome3/lcms2_2.9.bb | 14 ++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome3/lcms2_2.9.bb
>
> d
From: Brendan Kerrigan
Signed-off-by: Brendan Kerrigan
---
meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome3/lcms2_2.9.bb | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome3/lcms2_2.9.bb
diff --git a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome3/lcms2_2.9.bb
b/meta-gnome
