Sorry for the late reply, I've seen the patch has been merged into master-next
but I let this thread unanswered. Here are some thoughts to explain it.
On mercredi 26 avril 2017 16:57:29 CEST Joe MacDonald wrote:
> [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] strongswan: Split plugins] On 17.04.20
(Thu
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] strongswan: Split plugins] On 17.04.20 (Thu
16:36) Martin Jansa wrote:
> I think currently the preferred way is only one -dev/-dbg/-staticdev
> package per recipe.
>
> Why not set RDEPENDS_${PN} based on plugins packaged in first
> do_spli
I think currently the preferred way is only one -dev/-dbg/-staticdev
package per recipe.
Why not set RDEPENDS_${PN} based on plugins packaged in first do_split_packages
call?
Just my 2c - I'm not using strongswan and Joe has last word for
meta-networking.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:57 PM, David
strongSwan offers a plugin mechanism therefore it should not be
mandatory to install all of them when installing the package. Each
plugin is now a self-contained package with the library and its
configuration.
To remain compatible with the current configuration, a default set of
plugins has been
