On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 14:09, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
No; The @ is to allow multiple instance. Look at
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
Another corner case I would like to understand: What is the role of in
busybox syslog.service linking to dev/null. Within busybox itself it
seems not referenced.
To make it to use the .service file and not the
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 17:53, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
For test I did with a bunch of recipes
1. build from scratch with unmodified sources
2. Applied sytemd-patches and the 'cleanup'-patches (removing obsolete
systemd code in recipes)
3. build recipes again
4.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:55:56PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 17:53, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
For test I did with a bunch of recipes
1. build from scratch with unmodified sources
2. Applied sytemd-patches and the 'cleanup'-patches
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 17:53, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
For test I did with a bunch of recipes
1. build from scratch with unmodified sources
2. Applied sytemd-patches and the
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 17:53, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
For test I did with a bunch of recipes
1.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 17:53, Andreas Müller
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
../package/src/debug/
of course this must be
../package/usr/src/debug/
started a build from scratch with systemd patches...
Andreas
___
Openembedded-devel mailing
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 14:38, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
systemd-systemctl-native
Off list @Otavio: not boring but challenging...
To reuse as much as possible: Is there a piece of code
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:42, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
Currently I am testing the automatic parsing for different recipes.
Following the 'After=' and 'WantedBy=' works fine but before sending
out I would like to get some comments on the following
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
No; The @ is to allow multiple instance. Look at
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html
How about the old strategy for *@.service:
If there is only one *-systemd package with one entry in
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 14:09, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
No; The @ is to allow multiple instance. Look at
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html
How about the
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 20:15, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
If there is one *-systemd package with one entry in SYSTEMD_SERVICE,
the whole directory is installed - otherwise only the files found in
SYSTEMD_SERVICE. If a recipe installs too much or something is
missing, it
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 20:15, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
If there is one *-systemd package with one entry in SYSTEMD_SERVICE,
the whole directory is installed - otherwise only the files
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:05, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
If for example I put two .socket files, your algorithm will break. That's
why I said you need to parse it. It is not that difficult as the logic is
the same as the wrapper used in rootfs generation.
Sorry -
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:05, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
If for example I put two .socket files, your algorithm will break. That's
why I said you need to parse it. It is not that
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 14:38, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
systemd-systemctl-native
Off list @Otavio: not boring but challenging...
To reuse as much as possible: Is there a piece of code showing me how
to mix up shell/python code?
Not that I am aware of but you can
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 00:00, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.comwrote:
In case SYSTEMD_SERVICE contains only one *.service file, the whole folder
${base_libdir}/systemd/system/ is added to FILES_*
In case SYSTEMD_SERVICE contains only one *.service file, the whole folder
${base_libdir}/systemd/system/ is added to FILES_* otherwise only the *.service
files found in SYSTEMD_SERVICE.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
meta-oe/classes/systemd.bbclass | 16
19 matches
Mail list logo
