On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Andrej Rode wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I think you could just do SRC_URI += and remove patch=1 and pnum=1
>> they are defaults.
>>
>
> yeah, that would be better, but as Martin pointed out all my pending patches
> are already merged.
> Sorry for
Hi,
I think you could just do SRC_URI += and remove patch=1 and pnum=1
they are defaults.
yeah, that would be better, but as Martin pointed out all my pending
patches are already merged.
Sorry for resending and not checking if they are already merged.
I was looking at patchwork, but
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Andrej Rode wrote:
> Add recipe for python-mprpc, a messagepack RPC library for python
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrej Rode
> ---
> .../python-mprpc/files/0001-fix_setup_py.patch | 34
> ++
>
Add recipe for python-mprpc, a messagepack RPC library for python
Signed-off-by: Andrej Rode
---
.../python-mprpc/files/0001-fix_setup_py.patch | 34 ++
.../python-mprpc/python-mprpc_0.1.13.bb| 17 +++
2 files changed, 51
Why patch=1 parameter? it will be autumatically recognized and applied as
patch thanks to .patch extension.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Andrej Rode wrote:
> Add recipe for python-mprpc, a messagepack RPC library for python
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrej Rode
Add recipe for python-mprpc, a messagepack RPC library for python
Signed-off-by: Andrej Rode
---
.../python-mprpc/files/0001-fix_setup_py.patch | 34 ++
.../python-mprpc/python-mprpc_0.1.13.bb| 17 +++
2 files changed, 51