Hello Khem,
Actually we'd like to stay on HEAD and build our own distribution on
top of that. Hence I'm more interested in getting ti81xx-psp-2.6.37 to
work with gcc-4.7. I'll try Martin Jansa's hint
(-mno-unaligned-access) next.
then use the default gcc that angstrom head is using which is
Hello *.*,
Khem Raj (3):
eglibc-2.12: Remove
binutils-2.20: Remove
gcc-4.5: Remove
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support. You only get a heavily patched 2.6.37 kernel from TI for
these (linux-ti81xx-psp_2.6.37). Unfortunately gcc = 4.6
On 2012-05-16 04:50, Thilo Fromm wrote:
Hello *.*,
Khem Raj (3):
eglibc-2.12: Remove
binutils-2.20: Remove
gcc-4.5: Remove
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support. You only get a heavily patched 2.6.37 kernel from TI for
these
Hello Gary,
Hello *.*,
Khem Raj (3):
eglibc-2.12: Remove
binutils-2.20: Remove
gcc-4.5: Remove
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support. You only get a heavily patched 2.6.37 kernel from TI for
these (linux-ti81xx-psp_2.6.37).
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Thilo Fromm fr...@dresearch-fe.de wrote:
Hello *.*,
Khem Raj (3):
eglibc-2.12: Remove
binutils-2.20: Remove
gcc-4.5: Remove
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support. You only get a heavily patched
Hello Martin,
Hello *.*,
Khem Raj (3):
eglibc-2.12: Remove
binutils-2.20: Remove
gcc-4.5: Remove
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support. You only get a heavily patched 2.6.37 kernel from TI for
these (linux-ti81xx-psp_2.6.37).
Hello Gary,
Khem Raj (3):
eglibc-2.12: Remove
binutils-2.20: Remove
gcc-4.5: Remove
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support. You only get a heavily patched 2.6.37 kernel from TI for
these (linux-ti81xx-psp_2.6.37). Unfortunately gcc=
On 2012-05-16 06:41, Thilo Fromm wrote:
Hello Gary,
Khem Raj (3):
eglibc-2.12: Remove
binutils-2.20: Remove
gcc-4.5: Remove
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support. You only get a heavily patched 2.6.37 kernel from TI for
these
Hello Gary,
[ ti81xx-psp-2.6.37 defconfig ]
The only real differences (modulo the hardware/peripherals in use)
are some of the kernel debugging settings. Perhaps they are causing
some problems with the newer compiler. The diffs between our
configurations
are attached.
Thanks, but I don't
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Thilo Fromm fr...@dresearch-fe.de wrote:
Removing gcc-4.5 would kill Texas Instruments DaVinci (dm814x, dm816x)
support.
how so ? can you stick with denzil stable branch if you so heavily depend on 4.5
and meanwhile let the software stack for these SOCs ported
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Thilo Fromm fr...@dresearch-fe.de wrote:
Thanks, looks like I'll need it :) By the way, we successfully pulled
gcc-4.5 in our layer and are building with gcc-4.5 on angstrom-v2012.x
right now. Since you're on 8148 as well, and in case you would like to
stay
Hello Khem,
Thanks, looks like I'll need it :) By the way, we successfully pulled
gcc-4.5 in our layer and are building with gcc-4.5 on angstrom-v2012.x
right now. Since you're on 8148 as well, and in case you would like to
stay up-to-date on what we're doing, just check
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Thilo Fromm fr...@dresearch-fe.de wrote:
Actually we'd like to stay on HEAD and build our own distribution on
top of that. Hence I'm more interested in getting ti81xx-psp-2.6.37 to
work with gcc-4.7. I'll try Martin Jansa's hint
(-mno-unaligned-access) next.
Hi Koen
Since meta-oe is not branched for denzil this patch removes the old
components in there for toolchain recipes. I have left gcc 4.6 in there
for now since OE-Core still have those recipes.
The following changes since commit 14869e500c1a2f6be4704bf7399435fda00dc34c:
klibc: upgrade to
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:01:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi Koen
Since meta-oe is not branched for denzil this patch removes the old
Did you mean is now branched above?
Since 4.6/4.7 is now seems to work fine for me:
Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com
components in there for
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:01:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi Koen
Since meta-oe is not branched for denzil this patch removes the old
Did you mean is now branched above?
Yes indeed it was a typo
Since 4.6/4.7 is now seems
16 matches
Mail list logo
