Re: [oe] Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

2015-04-02 Thread Randy MacLeod
On 2015-04-02 12:57 AM, Tim Orling wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:39 PM, akuster808 akuster...@gmail.com mailto:akuster...@gmail.com wrote: Randy, On 03/02/2015 06:26 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote: As

Re: [oe] Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

2015-04-01 Thread akuster808
Randy, On 03/02/2015 06:26 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote: As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported and CVEs will not be released. I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to ruby-2.2.0 which became the

Re: [oe] Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

2015-04-01 Thread Tim Orling
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:39 PM, akuster808 akuster...@gmail.com wrote: Randy, On 03/02/2015 06:26 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote: As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported and CVEs will not be released. I'm

Re: [oe] Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

2015-03-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:14:29AM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote: As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported and CVEs will not be released. I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to ruby-2.2.0 which became the stable version as of December 25, 2014. Comments?

[oe] Discuss: ruby-1.9.x EOL -- someone to add ruby-2.2?

2015-03-02 Thread Randy MacLeod
As stated in the post below, ruby-1.9.3 is no longer supported and CVEs will not be released. I'm not a rubyist but I assume we should upgrade to ruby-2.2.0 which became the stable version as of December 25, 2014. Comments? Martin, you are listed as maintainer of the meta-multimedia, do you