[oe] [RFC] Remove vala from oe-core

Hi all, There's currently no software built with vala in oe-core. That's not great for vala (as it's not getting the automated testing that high quality maintenance would require) and it's not great for oe-core (as maintenance effort is better spent on components that _are_ used). Based on the

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 2/5] evince: Remove pkg-config check for specific icon theme

Also rrecommend adwaita-icon-theme instead of gnome-icon-theme (as latter is removed from oe-core). Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- ...ove-pkg-config-check-for-gnome-icon-theme.patch | 35 ++ meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/evince/evince_2.32.0.bb

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/5] gupnp-tools: Upgrade 0.8.1 -> 0.8.10

* Icon theme is no longer a build requirement. * RRecommend Adwaita as icon theme * Depend on GTK+3 * license checksum change is not an actual license change Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- .../gupnp/{gupnp-tools_0.8.1.bb => gupnp-tools_0.8.10.bb}

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 4/5] gnome-themes: Depend on adwaita, not gnome-icon-theme

RDEPEND on adwaita-icon-theme instead of gnome-icon-theme (as latter is removed from oe-core). Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/themes/gnome-themes_2.32.1.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta

[oe] Update recipes that refer to gnome-icon-theme

Following patches remove references to gnome-icon-theme which has been removed from oe-core. In some cases they've been replaced with "adwaita-icon-theme", but in others some additional changes were required (mostly when the build system unnecessarily checks for the theme). Cheers, Jussi

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 3/5] gnome-system-monitor: Remove pkg-config check for specific icon theme

Also rrecommend adwaita-icon-theme instead of gnome-icon-theme (as latter is removed from oe-core). Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- ...ove-pkg-config-check-for-gnome-icon-theme.patch | 30 ++ .../gnome-system-monitor_2.28.2.bb

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 5/5] xfce4-settings: recommend adwaita, not gnome-icon-theme

RRECOMMEND adwaita-icon-theme instead of gnome-icon-theme (as latter is removed from oe-core). Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/xfce4-settings/xfce4-settings_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/met

[oe] [PATCH] libgudev: Remove (moved to OE-Core)

libgudev was added to OE-Core in revision c6d37fc47f. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- meta-oe/recipes-gnome/libgudev/libgudev_230.bb | 15 --- 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-gnome/libgudev/libgudev_230.bb diff

[oe] [PATCH][meta-gnome] gtk-engines: Move from oe-core

gtk-engines is being removed from oe-core (as there will be no themes there that need an engine). Move recipe to meta-gnome since gnome-themes depends on gtk-engines. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- The oe-core patch email can be found on openembe

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 2/2] Update vte users to use vte9

geany-plugins seems to compile fine with new vte: that recipe was not modified. gnome-terminal and valaterminal are currently blacklisted for other reasons. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome/gnome-terminal_2.30.2.bb | 2 +- m

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/2] vte9: Add old vte into meta-oe

vte versioning is a little confusing: vte-2.91.pc (version 0.44.1) provided by oe-core "vte" vte-2.90.pc (current version 0.36.3) not in openembedded, can be patched to use "vte" vte.pc (current version 0.28.2): provided by meta-oe "vte9" (naming from

[oe] augeas: oe-core removal warning

Morning, I'm considering removing the augeas recipe from oe-core: it has not really been depended on by anything since Danny (rpm has a non-default PACKAGECONFIG but even that is accompanied by comments about no testing) and we have nothing testing its functionality. Please speak up now if you

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] augeas: Move from oe-core

augeas is being removed from oe-core as nothing there uses or tests it. Move the recipe to meta-networking where the only meta-oe reverse dependency (netcf) lives. Also upgrade to 1.5.0: no recipe changes needed. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- meta-netw

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] augeas: Move from oe-core

On 12 July 2016 at 16:41, Joe MacDonald <joe_macdon...@mentor.com> wrote: > [[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] augeas: Move from oe-core] On 16.07.12 (Tue > 14:50) Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > > augeas is being removed from oe-core as nothing there uses or tests > >

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCHv2] augeas: Move from oe-core

augeas is being removed from oe-core as nothing there uses or tests it. Move the recipe to meta-oe as there's still one dependency in meta-openembedded (netcf in meta-networking). Also upgrade to 1.5.0: no recipe changes needed. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.

Re: [oe] /usr merge, stateless systems and atomic updates w/ OpenEmbedded?

On 15 January 2017 at 01:41, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello Khem, > > I know outside of OE it is more and more common place, such as Project > Atomic. > > Re-reading some of the material I have found, I found that Chen Qi of Wind > River had something going. > >

[oe] [PATCH 0/3] Clean up X init (oe-core vs meta-oe)

8-25 23:09:29 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib jku/xserver-nodm http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=jku/xserver-nodm Jussi Kukkonen (3): base-files: Add shell test quoting xserver-nodm-init: Deprecate /etc/X11/Xserver

[oe] [PATCH 1/3] base-files: Add shell test quoting

tty can return "not a tt" which results in warnings when /etc/profile is executed. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files/profile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core

[oe] [PATCH 3/3] x11-common: Remove Xserver script

X startup is now handled in xserver-nodm-init. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- meta/recipes-graphics/x11-common/x11-common/Xserver.in | 12 meta/recipes-graphics/x11-common/x11-common_0.1.bb | 10 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(

[oe] [PATCH 2/3] xserver-nodm-init: Deprecate /etc/X11/Xserver

-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- .../x11-common/xserver-nodm-init.bb| 47 +- .../x11-common/xserver-nodm-init/Xserver | 25 .../x11-common/xserver-nodm-init/Xusername | 1 - .../x11-common/xserver-nodm-init/x

[oe] [PATCH 1/2] xserver-nodm-init-2.0: Remove recipe

The version in oe-core should now do everything this one does with one exception: it does not RDEPEND on xserver-common. This dependency now needs to be set explicitly. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- .../xserver-nodm-init-2.0/gplv2-license.patch

[oe] [PATCH 2/2] xserver-common: Don't install some Xsession files

. Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> --- .../0001-Don-t-install-Xsession-or-Xserver.patch | 30 ++ ...0003-add-89xdgautostart-Xsession.d-script.patch | 29 - ...0005-add-XWindowManager-Xsession.d-script.patc

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] X initialization refactoring

This set has a companion set on oe-core, neither set makes much sense without the other. Cover letters are identical. Please CC both lists if needed. Current state: * meta-oe and oe-core both provide xserver-nodm-init: the oe-core version should already do everything the meta-oe version

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] autoconf-archive: drop m4files confliction with gnome-common

On 19 April 2017 at 09:28, Zhixiong Chi wrote: > Delete the conflicting m4files with gnome-common to avoid the confliction, > and the two m4 files will be installed by gnome-common that comes from > oe-core, then set rdepends to gnome-common. > For those who missed

Re: [oe] chromium detected as stripped

On 13 August 2017 at 02:10, Andreas Müller wrote: > Hi, > > in current OE environment 'file' says: > > <...>image/usr/bin/chromium/chrome: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, ARM, > EABI5 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter > /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3,

Re: [oe] chromium detected as stripped

On 14 August 2017 at 10:04, Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> wrote: > On 13 August 2017 at 02:10, Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> in current OE environment 'file' says: >> >> <...>image/u

Re: [oe] [meta-python] python-pygobject is not building and installing gi (gi.repository etc) modules on the target

On 11 July 2017 at 00:49, Brownson Obele wrote: >1. The main python module i am trying to add to my yocto build image is >LDTP (https://github.com/ldtp/ldtp2). Using devtool, i have been able > to >create a recipe for it which seems to build without any errors.

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] gnome-common: Add recipe (from oe-core)

gnome-common is deprecated upstream (it's just a collection of m4 macros so that's not a huge issue) and more importantly is soon not used in oe-core. There are 6 recipes in meta-oe and 22 in meta-gnome that DEPEND on gnome-common: Move gnome-common unchanged to meta-oe. Signed-off-by: Jussi

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openconnect: fix parallel compilation failure

On 23 August 2017 at 13:08, wrote: > From: Chen Qi > > This patch solves the following error which appears now and then because of > parallel building. > > ../git/main.c:78:21: fatal error: version.c: No such file or directory > > version.c is

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/2] xf86-video-mga: add new recipe

On 23 May 2017 at 17:54, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:01 AM, wrote: > > From: Jackie Huang > > > > mga is an Xorg driver for Matrox video cards > > > > Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang