Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-22 Thread Burton, Ross
On 21 February 2016 at 22:44, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I'd note that if we had a way to know if a recipe was really autotools > or just acts a bit like it, it would help a lot... > Something I've been meaning to do for a long time is review everything that is

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 11:47 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > What's the advantage of more global .inc file? In OE-Core it started as a standalone experiment which made sense as a separate .inc as we've done with some other things of this nature. I thought it was going to take longer to work through

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-21 Thread Martin Jansa
What's the advantage of more global .inc file? IMHO it's only increasing chances for conflicts when merging/cherry-picking. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 20:43 +, Christopher Larson wrote: > > I think

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 20:43 +, Christopher Larson wrote: > I think the convention is to add such workarounds to no-static > -libs.inc, > not the recipe, at this time. This is a good question. I was just doing some world builds with meta -oe in and have a few more of these fixes. Referencing

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-19 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > I think the convention is to add such workarounds to no-static-libs.inc, > not the recipe, at this time. For OE-Core, yes. For Meta-OE? I think the recipe is the easiest to notice when doing the upgrade. -- Otavio

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-18 Thread Christopher Larson
I think the convention is to add such workarounds to no-static-libs.inc, not the recipe, at this time. On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:30 AM Fabio Berton wrote: > As of commit OE-Core:773c9e18071d71454473dd81aff911104a2e9bc6 > EXTRA_OECONF is appended with the option

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fio: Remove --disable-static from EXTRA_OECONF

2016-02-18 Thread Fabio Berton
As of commit OE-Core:773c9e18071d71454473dd81aff911104a2e9bc6 EXTRA_OECONF is appended with the option --disable-static on DISABLE_STATIC variable and this cause the error: DEBUG: Python function sysroot_cleansstate finished DEBUG: Executing shell function do_configure Bad option