Hi Raj
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> +
>> +diff --git a/cmake/OpenCVUtils.cmake b/cmake/OpenCVUtils.cmake
>> +index 3a23cd73633d..1fea1578b1d9 100644
>> +--- a/cmake/OpenCVUtils.cmake
>> b/cmake/OpenCVUtils.cmake
>> +@@ -76,7 +76,11 @@
Hi Otavio
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
> wrote:
>> It seems like gcc 6.0 does not have the same behaviour as previous 5.x
>> with regards isystem
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
> It seems like gcc 6.0 does not have the same behaviour as previous 5.x
> with regards isystem flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
Did you check if there is a new
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
> wrote:
>
> It seems like gcc 6.0 does not have the same behaviour as previous 5.x
> with regards isystem flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
> ---
>
Sorry for the resend, but I forgot to add the Mailing list.
Regards
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
It seems like gcc 6.0 does not have the same behaviour as previous 5.x
with regards isystem flag.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
---
.../recipes-support/opencv/opencv/fixgcc60.patch | 30 ++
meta-oe/recipes-support/opencv/opencv_3.1.bb